Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257274›Full record

ArticleNursing open2020

Informal task-sharing practices in inpatient newborn settings in a low-income setting-A task analysis approach.

Gregory B Omondi, Georgina A V Murphy, Debra Jackson, Sharon Brownie, Mike English, David Gathara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregory B OmondiKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-1489
Georgina A V MurphyKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi Kenya.
Debra JacksonFaculty of Health University of Technology Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-5325
Sharon BrownieSchool of Medicine Griffith University Nathan Qld Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7204-2451
Mike EnglishKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi Kenya.
David GatharaKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi Kenya.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M015386/1Medical Research Council MR/R018510/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To describe the complexity and criticality of neonatal nursing tasks and existing task-sharing practices to identify tasks that might be safely shared in inpatient neonatal settings. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large geographically dispersed sample using the STROBE guidelines. Methods: We used a task analysis approach to describe the complexity/criticality of neonatal nursing tasks and to explore the nature of task sharing using data from structured, self-administered questionnaires. Data was collected between 26th April and 22nd August 2017. Results: Thirty-two facilities were surveyed between 26th April and 22nd August, 2017. Nearly half (42%, 6/14) of the "moderately critical" and "not critical" (41%, 5/11) tasks were ranked as consuming most of the nurses' time and reported as shared with mothers respectively. Most tasks were reported as shared in the public sector than in the private-not-for-profit facilities. This may largely be a response to inadequate nurse staffing, as such, there may be space for considering the future role of health care assistants.

Indexed as

InpatientsPublic SectorCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornPovertySurveys and Questionnaireshealthcare assistantsneonatal taskstask analysistask sharingtask shifting

Identifiers

PMID32257274
PMCPMC7113512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.