ArticleNursing open2020
Perception of diabetes management and cardiovascular disease risk among men with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study.
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diabetes Mellitus Duration and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of vascular medicine · 2026Article
- The Prevalence of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Jordan: The PACT-MEA Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Article
- Assessment of Knowledge on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing research and practice · 2025Article
- Cognitive and Emotional Perceptions of Illness in Patients Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Perception of diabetes management and cardiovascular disease risk among men with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the perception and understanding of men with type 2 diabetes about their illness control, risk for CVD and their adherence to healthcare management plans in Jordan. Design: A qualitative descriptive design was used, recruiting a purposive sample of 13 men diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Data were collected between February and April 2019 through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis. Results: Data analysis revealed four themes: (a) Perception of diabetes control; (b) Perception of cardiovascular disease risk; (c) Coping with disease-imposed limitations; and (d) Information validation. Conclusion: The study concludes that the perception of disease control does not necessarily coincide with actual disease control. Examining patients with diabetes perception and knowledge of their healthcare management and increased CVD risks is essential. An individualized culture and gender-sensitive health education and counselling involving spouses are recommended. Social media to disseminate scientific valid health instructions can enhance adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.