Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257259›Full record

ArticleNursing open2020

Newly graduated registered nurses' self-assessed clinical competence and their need for further training.

Anna Willman, Kaisa Bjuresäter, Jan Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. When caring becomes an art - how clinical gaze are perceived to be developed.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna WillmanDepartment of Health Sciences Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5911-6743
Kaisa BjuresäterDepartment of Health Sciences Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden.
Jan NilssonDepartment of Health Sciences Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore and describe changes in self-assessed clinical competence and the need for further training among newly graduated Registered Nurses during their first 15 months of professional work in acute care hospital settings. Design: Quantitative longitudinal design. Methods: The 50-item Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale of clinical core competencies II was used. A total of 45 newly graduated Registered Nurses answered the questionnaire at four different occasions. Data were collected after 2, 5, 9 and 15 months of working experience. Result: The components "ethical decision-making," "cooperation and consultation" and "clinical leadership" were rated highest in clinical competence and lowest in need for further training. The components "professional development" and "critical thinking" were rated lowest in clinical competence and "direct clinical practice" rated highest in need for further training. The clinical competence increased significant between 9-15 months, with the exception of "critical thinking" and need for further training decreased significantly between 9-15 months, with the exception of "critical thinking."

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceNursesHumansSelf-AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesThinkingacute care settingsclinical competencecompetence developmentcomplex patient situationsnewly registered graduated nursesnurse competence

Identifiers

PMID32257259
PMCPMC7113520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.