Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257128›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2020

A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Marzieh Esmaeili, Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh, Nasrin Ahmadinejad, Marjan Ghazisaeedi, Azin Nahvijou, Keivan Maghooli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marzieh Esmaeili1Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh1Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-7818
Nasrin Ahmadinejad3Medical Imaging Cancer, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan Ghazisaeedi1Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Azin Nahvijou5Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keivan Maghooli6Department of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMammography plays a key role in the diagnosis of breast cancer; however, decision-making based on mammography reports is still challenging. This paper aims to addresses the challenges regarding decision-making based on mammography reports and propose a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) using data mining methods to help clinicians to interpret mammography reports.

methodsFor this purpose, 2441 mammography reports were collected from Imam Khomeini Hospital from March 21, 2018, to March 20, 2019. In the first step, these mammography reports are analyzed and program code is developed to transform the reports into a dataset. Then, the weight of every feature of the dataset is calculated. Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbor (K-NN), Deep Learning classifiers are applied to the dataset to build a model capable of predicting the need for referral to biopsy. Afterward, the models are evaluated using cross-validation with measuring Area Under Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity indices.

resultsThe mammography type (diagnostic or screening), mass and calcification features mentioned in the reports are the most important features for decision-making. Results reveal that the K-NN model is the most accurate and specific classifier with the accuracy and specificity values of 84.06% and 84.72% respectively. The Random Forest classifier has the best sensitivity and AUC with the sensitivity and AUC values of 87.74% and 0.905 respectively.

conclusionsAccordingly, data mining approaches are proved to be a helpful tool to make the final decision as to whether patients should be referred to biopsy or not based on mammography reports. The developed CDSS may also be helpful especially for less experienced radiologists.

Indexed as

BI-RADSBreast cancerCDSSData miningMammography report

Identifiers

PMID32257128
PMCPMC7113352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.