ArticleHealth information science and systems2020
Cardiotocograph-based labor stage classification from uterine contraction pressure during ante-partum and intra-partum period: a fuzzy theoretic approach.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multiscale PBPK-PD model of oxytocin-induced uterine excitation and contraction.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- A hybrid stacked ensemble and Kernel SHAP-based model for intelligent cardiotocography classification and interpretability.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Optical coherence tomography of human fetal membrane sub-layers during loading.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Fuzzy Logic Intelligent Systems and Methods in Midwifery and Obstetrics.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2021Review
- Predicting nifedipine responses in preterm labor: a risk score incorporating ABCG2 polymorphisms and clinical factors.PharmacogenomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computerized techniques for Cardiotocograph (CTG) based labor stage classification would support obstetrician for advance CTG analysis and would improve their predictive power for fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring. Intrapartum fetal monitoring is necessary as it can detect the event, which ultimately leads to hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral palsy or even fetal demise. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose an automated decision support system that will help the obstetrician identify the status of the fetus during ante-partum and intra-partum period. The proposed algorithm takes 30 min of 275 Cardiotocograph data and applies a fuzzy-rule based approach for identification and classification of labor from 'toco' signal. Since there is no gold standard to validate the outcome of the proposed algorithm, the authors used various statistical means to establish the cogency of the proposed algorithm and the degree of agreement with visual estimation were using Bland-Altman plot, Fleiss kappa (0.918 ± 0.0164 at 95% CI) and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W = 0.845). Proposed method was also compared against some standard machine learning classifiers like SVM, Random Forest and Naïve Bayes using weighted kappa (0.909), Bland-Altman plot (Limits of Agreement 0.094 to 0.0155 at 95% CI) and AUC-ROC (0.938). The proposed algorithm was found to be as efficient as visual estimation compared to the standard machine learning algorithms and thus can be incorporated into the automated decision support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.