Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257015›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2020

Comparing the Role of Different Treatment Modalities for Plantar Fasciitis: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ravi Gupta, Anubhav Malhotra, Gladson David Masih, Tanu Khanna, Harsimranjit Kaur, Parmanand Gupta, Shweta Kashyap

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05240872 (Is There Any Advantage of PRP Over Autologous Blood Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis? A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05240872 phase3completednot on this map

Is There Any Advantage of PRP Over Autologous Blood Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis? A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Training and Research HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsPlantar FascitisArmsPRP injection, ABI injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ravi Gupta1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.
Anubhav Malhotra1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.
Gladson David Masih1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.
Tanu Khanna1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.
Harsimranjit Kaur2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.
Parmanand Gupta1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.
Shweta Kashyap1Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160030 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough many treatment modalities including rest, stretching, strengthening, change of shoes, arch supports, orthotics, night splints and anti-inflammatory agents have been advocated for plantar fasciitis, there is no report in the literature which compares the independent effectiveness of each treatment modality without the concomitant use of any other one.

methodsA double blind, randomized controlled study was undertaken where 140 patients of plantar fasciitis were divided into four groups with 35 patients each. Patients in four groups received analgesics, hot water fomentation and silicon heel pads, plantar fascia stretching and calf stretching exercises, respectively. Heel pain was evaluated using Foot Function Index (FFI) and disability using Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). Clinical evaluation was done weekly up to a period of 4 months and then at 6 months, 8 months, 10 months and 12 months.

resultsMean age of patients was 43.4 ± 10.6 years with average duration of symptoms being 27.26 weeks (range 4-200 weeks). Both FFI and FADI showed statistically significant improvement at 12 months in all the four groups (

conclusionPlantar fascia stretching exercises resulted in most significant improvement in both the scores (FFI and FADI), followed by treatment with heat and silicone heel pad and calf stretching exercises.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsCalf stretchingPlantar fascia stretchingPlantar fasciitisSilicone heel pad and moist heat

Identifiers

PMID32257015
PMCPMC7093625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.