ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2019
PREDICTION OF TREATMENT OUTCOME FOR AUTISM FROM STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN BASED ON SURE INDEPENDENCE SCREENING.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can Autism Be Diagnosed with Artificial Intelligence? A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder, and behavioral treatment interventions have shown promise for young children with ASD. However, there is limited progress in understanding the effect of each type of treatment. In this project, we aim to detect structural changes in the brain after treatment and select structural features associated with treatment outcomes. The difficulty in building large databases of patients who have received specific treatments and the high dimensionality of medical image analysis problems are the challenges in this work. To select predictive features and build accurate models, we use the sure independence screening (SIS) method. SIS is a theoretically and empirically validated method for ultra-high dimensional general linear models, and it achieves both predictive accuracy and correct feature selection by iterative feature selection. Compared with step-wise feature selection methods, SIS removes multiple features in each iteration and is computationally efficient. Compared with other linear models such as elastic-net regression, support vector regression (SVR) and partial least squares regression (PSLR), SIS achieves higher accuracy. We validated the superior performance of SIS in various experiments: First, we extract brain structural features from FreeSurfer, including cortical thickness, surface area, mean curvature and cortical volume. Next, we predict different measures of treatment outcomes based on structural features. We show that SIS achieves the highest correlation between prediction and measurements in all tasks. Furthermore, we report regions selected by SIS as biomarkers for ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.