Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256899›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Exploring Canadian pharmacy students' e-health literacy: a mixed method study.

Jamie Y Park, Jason Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamie Y ParkFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC, (Canada). jamie.park@alumni.ubc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0696-7434
Jason MinBSc(Pharm), RPh. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC, (Canada). jason.min@ubc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-1972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile much has been described about technology use by digital natives in general, understanding of pharmacy student's knowledge and understanding of technology is lacking.

objectiveThis study explores the current state of pharmacy students' self-rated digital health literacy in British Columbia, Canada, and seeks to identify future opportunities for technology training in pharmacy education and in practice.

methodsA mixed methods design using surveys and semi-structured interviews was conducted. An online, validated survey (eHEALS) was conducted among currently enrolled 2

resultsA total of 30 pharmacy students completed the eHEALS survey and 5 completed interviews. Most participants were 2

conclusionsThese results expose significant and surprising gaps in student understanding of technology despite modifications seen in the entry-to-practice PharmD curriculum. Regional differences and digital health literacy of practicing pharmacists are areas that require better understanding and hold significant impact as practice evolves.

Indexed as

CanadaComputer-AssistedCurriculumEducationHealth LiteracyInternetPharmacistsPharmacyQualitative ResearchStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineTherapy

Identifiers

PMID32256899
PMCPMC7104795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.