ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2020
Predicting long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation by a machine learning algorithm: Validation of the CAAP-AF score.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating traditional statistics and explainable machine learning for risk stratification of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulsed field ablation: a hypothesis-generating single-center study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Atrial fibrillation type-specific prediction of recurrence after catheter ablation: the pivotal role of right atrial remodeling revealed by explainable machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A computed tomography-based radiomics-clinical model incorporating left atrial and proximal pulmonary vein features predicts recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Role of Computational Modelling in Enhancing Thermal Safety During Cardiac Ablation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Uplift modeling to identify patients who require extensive catheter ablation procedures among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Research on prediction model of adolescent suicide and self-injury behavior based on machine learning algorithm.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- An Artificial Intelligence-Enabled ECG Algorithm for Predicting the Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Critical appraisal of technologies to assess electrical activity during atrial fibrillation: a position paper from the European Heart Rhythm Association and European Society of Cardiology Working Group on eCardiology in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Latin American Heart Rhythm Society and Computing in Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Computational models of atrial fibrillation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives for improving clinical care.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
- Machine Learning in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology.Circulation research · 2021Review
- Predicting long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation by a machine learning algorithm: Validation of the CAAP-AF score.Journal of arrhythmia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreprocedural clinical predictors of the successful maintenance of sinus rhythm may contribute to optimal treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). The CAAP-AF score, a novel simple tool scored as 0-13 points (including six independent variables) has been proposed to predict long-term freedom from AF after catheter ablation. To clarify its reproducibility, we examined the CAAP-AF score's predictive performance and then created subgroups to best predict AF recurrence by using a machine learning algorithm.
methodsWe studied 583 consecutive patients who underwent initial AF catheter ablation at our institute (median CAAP-AF score, 5; age, 66 ± 10 years old; female, 28.3%; coronary artery disease, 10.8%; left atrial diameter, 39.9 ± 6.6 mm; number of antiarrhythmic drugs failed, 0.4 ± 0.6; nonparoxysmal AF, 45.3%). All were systematically followed up with an endpoint of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after the last ablation procedure.
resultsDuring the 1.8 ± 1.2-year follow-up, 157 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Repeated procedures were performed (n = 115). Arrhythmia recurrence after the last session occurred in 69 patients. We created Kaplan-Meier curves for freedom from AF after final AF ablation for ranges of CAAP-AF scores; these confirmed the original study results. The machine learning using Classification and Regression Trees divided the patients into three categories by the risk score: low (score ≤5), intermediate (score 6-8), and high (score ≥9).
conclusionsThe CAAP-AF score was useful to stratify the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence risk in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation into three categories. The score should be considered when deciding whether to perform AF ablation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.