Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256878›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2020

Predicting long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation by a machine learning algorithm: Validation of the CAAP-AF score.

Koichi Furui, Itsuro Morishima, Yasuhiro Morita, Yasunori Kanzaki, Kensuke Takagi, Ruka Yoshida, Hiroaki Nagai, Naoki Watanabe, Naoki Yoshioka, Ryota Yamauchi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of Computational Modelling in Enhancing Thermal Safety During Cardiac Ablation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koichi FuruiDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Itsuro MorishimaDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1444-090X
Yasuhiro MoritaDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Yasunori KanzakiDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Kensuke TakagiDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Ruka YoshidaDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Hiroaki NagaiDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Naoki WatanabeDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Naoki YoshiokaDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Ryota YamauchiDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Hideyuki TsuboiDepartment of Cardiology Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki Japan.
Toyoaki MuroharaDepartment of Cardiology Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Ogaki Municipal Hospital · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreprocedural clinical predictors of the successful maintenance of sinus rhythm may contribute to optimal treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). The CAAP-AF score, a novel simple tool scored as 0-13 points (including six independent variables) has been proposed to predict long-term freedom from AF after catheter ablation. To clarify its reproducibility, we examined the CAAP-AF score's predictive performance and then created subgroups to best predict AF recurrence by using a machine learning algorithm.

methodsWe studied 583 consecutive patients who underwent initial AF catheter ablation at our institute (median CAAP-AF score, 5; age, 66 ± 10 years old; female, 28.3%; coronary artery disease, 10.8%; left atrial diameter, 39.9 ± 6.6 mm; number of antiarrhythmic drugs failed, 0.4 ± 0.6; nonparoxysmal AF, 45.3%). All were systematically followed up with an endpoint of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after the last ablation procedure.

resultsDuring the 1.8 ± 1.2-year follow-up, 157 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Repeated procedures were performed (n = 115). Arrhythmia recurrence after the last session occurred in 69 patients. We created Kaplan-Meier curves for freedom from AF after final AF ablation for ranges of CAAP-AF scores; these confirmed the original study results. The machine learning using Classification and Regression Trees divided the patients into three categories by the risk score: low (score ≤5), intermediate (score 6-8), and high (score ≥9).

conclusionsThe CAAP-AF score was useful to stratify the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence risk in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation into three categories. The score should be considered when deciding whether to perform AF ablation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ablation outcomesatrial fibrillation ablationcatheter ablationcryoballoon ablationradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID32256878
PMCPMC7132192
OpenAlexW3004358442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.