Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256783›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020

Recommendations from primary care physicians, family, friends and work colleagues influence patients' decisions related to hepatitis screening, medical examinations and antiviral treatment.

Michiaki Okada, Satoshi Oeda, Naoko Katsuki, Shinji Iwane, Yasunori Kawaguchi, Saori Kawamoto, Yoshimi Tomine, Jun Fukuyoshi, Keishiro Maeyama, Hideo Tanaka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michiaki OkadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Satoshi OedaLiver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Naoko KatsukiDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Shinji IwaneLiver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Yasunori KawaguchiLiver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Saori KawamotoCancer Scan, Tokyo 141-0031, Japan.
Yoshimi TomineCancer Scan, Tokyo 141-0031, Japan.
Jun FukuyoshiCancer Scan, Tokyo 141-0031, Japan.
Keishiro MaeyamaLiver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Hideo TanakaDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan.
Keizo AnzaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Yuichiro EguchiLiver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga-Shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and screening of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is important to prevent liver cancer. Comprehensive antiviral treatments should follow three sequential steps: Hepatitis screening (step 1; examination of HB surface antigen and HCV antibody), medical examination (step 2; examination of HBV-DNA and/or HCV-RNA and performance of abdominal ultrasonography) and antiviral treatment (step 3). Patients who underwent these three steps were studied to determine effective information sources (factors) for raising awareness of comprehensive treatments. A total of 182 patients from 11 medical institutions were who were undergoing antiviral treatment were investigated. The number of patients who accessed each of the 18 information sources in each of the three steps and the percentage of these information sources that directly influenced the participants to make treatment-related decisions were calculated. 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' was the most common information source (64.3, 77.5, and 75.8% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a public health nurse (PHN),' 'recommendation from friends or family,' and 'recommendation from work colleagues' were the next most common human factors (3.3-19.8%). 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' had the greatest influence (76.9, 73.0, and 77.5% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a PHN' (50.0, 26.3 and 64.3%), 'recommendations from friends and family' (58.3, 38.9 and 58.3%), and 'recommendations from work colleagues' (33.3, 33.3 and 42.9%) were highly influential factors. Media such as TV commercial messages and programs also had high recognition, but were not directly influential. The findings of the present study indicated that recommendations from primary care physicians, friends, family and work colleagues influenced patients' decision-making regarding hepatitis screening, examination and treatment.

Indexed as

decision makingenlightenment activityprimary care physicianpublic health nursesocial factorTV commercial messageviral hepatitis

Identifiers

PMID32256783
PMCPMC7086226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.