Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256757›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020

The efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and left-side double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation under the guidance of chest CT.

Zhuo Liu, Li Zhao, Yan Zhu, Lina Bao, Qian-Qian Jia, Xiao-Chun Yang, Shu-Juan Liang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03392922 (A Comparison the Intubation of a Left Sided Double Lumen Tube and the Uniblocker Under the Guidence of Chest Computed Tomography Image), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03392922 nacompletednot on this map

A Comparison the Intubation of a Left Sided Double Lumen Tube and the Uniblocker Under the Guidence of Chest Computed Tomography Image

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Hospital of QinhuangdaoRan2018 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsTherapeutic Procedural ComplicationArmsUniblocker, Left-sided Double-lumen Tube
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhuo LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.
Li ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.
Yan ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.
Lina BaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.
Qian-Qian JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.
Xiao-Chun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.
Shu-Juan LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066000, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is essential in numerous clinical procedures, in which the left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT) is the most commonly used device. The application of bronchial blockers, including the Uniblocker or Arndt blocker, has increased in OLV. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and LDLT for OLV under the guidance of chest CT. A total of 60 adult patients undergoing elective left-side thoracic surgery requiring OLV were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to the Uniblocker group (U group, n=30) or the LDLT group (D group, n=30). The time for initial tube placement, the number of optimal positions of the tube upon blind insertion, the number of attempts to adjust the tube to the optimal position, incidence of airway device displacement, injury to the bronchi and carina, the duration until lung collapse and the occurrence of sore throat and hoarseness over 24 h following surgery were recorded. The time for successful placement of the LDLT was 83.9±19.4 sec and that for the Uniblocker was 84.3±17.1 sec (P>0.05). The degree of lung collapse 1 min following opening of the pleura was greater in the D group than that in the U group (P<0.01) and the time required for the lung to completely collapse was shorter in the D group (3.3±0.5 min) than that in the U group (8.4±1.2 min; P<0.01). On the contrary, the incidence of injury to the bronchi and carina was lower in the U group (2/30 cases) than in the D group (10/30 cases; P=0.02); the incidence of sore throat was also lower in the U group (2/30 cases) compared with that in the D group (9/30 cases). The mean arterial pressure of patients immediately following intubation was lower in the U group (122.0±13.4 mmHg) than that in the D group (129.2±12.1 mmHg; P<0.05). The results of the present study indicated that the extraluminal use of the Uniblocker under guidance of chest CT is an efficient method with few adverse effects in left-side thoracic surgery. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 16th December 2017 (no. NCT03392922).

Indexed as

double-lumen tubeintubationthoracic surgeryUniblocker

Identifiers

PMID32256757
PMCPMC7086194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.