ReviewEuropean cardiology2020
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management.
Review in European cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Premature coronary artery disease in women: sex-specific risk factors, pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical implications.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition and classification in hypercholesterolemic pigs.Atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Distinct demographic profiles of spontaneous coronary artery dissection and coronary artery aneurysm: a single-centre experience from the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- What Causes Premature Coronary Artery Disease?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Chest Pain: Wellens Syndrome Due to Spontaneous Dissection of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery - A Case Report and Literature Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and fibromuscular dysplasia: insights into recent developments.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection-associated takotsubo syndrome: A systematic review of case reports.World journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Sex, Racial, and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Novel Risk Factors and Recommendations for Earlier Diagnosis to Improve Outcomes.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Combined spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and Takotsubo syndrome (TTS): a case series.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Recurrent Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association with Takotsubo Syndrome and Fibromuscular Dysplasia; Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection of ramus intermedius in an elderly woman.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A review of diagnostic methods and management strategies.World journal of cardiology · 2022Review
- A Case of Postpartum Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy.Case reports in cardiology · 2022Article
- Pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection: multidisciplinary management, challenges and literature review.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively infrequent cause of acute coronary syndrome that usually affects young to middle-aged women. Mainly because of its low prevalence, until recently, most of the evidence on this condition was derived from case reports and small series. Over the last 5 years, more robust evidence has become available from larger retrospective and prospective cohorts of patients with SCAD. The increase in knowledge and recognition of this entity has led to the publication of expert consensus on both sides of the Atlantic. However, new data are continuously accumulating from larger cohorts of patients with SCAD, bringing new light to this little-understood condition. The aim of this article is to update the knowledge on SCAD, including new information from recent studies published since the consensus documents from the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.