ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2020
The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery.
Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative identification of tumor deposits in rectal cancer using a transformer-based multimodal fusion model: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- MRI-Based Differentiation of Tumor Deposits and Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Stratifying prognosis in stage III colorectal cancer patients: the role of tumor deposits and lymph node ratio.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Spectral computed tomography parameters of primary tumors and lymph nodes for predicting tumor deposits in colorectal cancer.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Utilizing tumor deposit count as a stratification criterion in revising TNM staging system for patients with colorectal cancer: a nomogram review study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Tumor Deposits as an Adverse Prognostic Indicator in Stage III Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Database Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients with Different N Stages: A Population-Based, Retrospective, Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Distinguishing mesorectal tumor deposits from metastatic lymph nodes by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer.European radiology · 2023Article
- Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer : Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Pathological Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Specimens Using Micro-Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predictive and Prognostic Assessment Models for Tumor Deposit in Colorectal Cancer Patients With No Distant Metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Nomogram for Rectal Cancer Patients With Tumor Deposits.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- MRI-detected extramural venous invasion of rectal cancer: Multimodality performance and implications at baseline imaging and after neoadjuvant therapy.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer after surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Clinicopathological factors associated with synchronous distant metastasis and prognosis of stage T1 colorectal cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Utility of texture analysis on T2-weighted MR for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer patients, in a retrospective cohort.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Corrigendum to "The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery".Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients.
methodPatients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival.
resultsX-tile plots identified 3 (
conclusionMore TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.