Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256392›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Dark Times: The Role of Negative Reinforcement in Methamphetamine Addiction.

April C May, Robin L Aupperle, Jennifer L Stewart

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

April C MayJoint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Robin L AupperleLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Jennifer L StewartLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Tulsa · US

Funding

Approach-Avoidance Conflict-a multi-level predictor for exposure therapy responseK23MH108707 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI AUPPERLE, ROBIN L · 2016 to 2020
$976k
A Prospective Investigation of Youth Alcohol Experimentation and Reward ResponsivityF31AA027169 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MAY, APRIL CHELSEA · 2018 to 2020
$114k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA027169NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methamphetamine use is associated with substantial adverse outcomes including poor mental and physical health, financial difficulties, and societal costs. Despite deleterious long-term consequences associated with methamphetamine, many people use drugs for short-term reduction of unpleasant physical or emotional sensations. By removing these aversive states, drug use behaviors are negatively reinforced. Abstinence from methamphetamine can then result in a return to previous aversive emotional states linked to withdrawal and craving, often contributing to an increased likelihood for relapse. This negative reinforcement cycle is hypothesized to be a motivating and maintaining factor for addiction. Thus, this review highlights the current evidence for negative reinforcement mechanisms in methamphetamine use disorder by integrating studies of subjective experience, behavior, functional magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and event-related potentials and examining the efficacy of treatments targeting aspects of negative reinforcement. Overall, the literature demonstrates that individuals who use methamphetamine have diminished cognitive control and process emotions, loss of reward, and interoceptive information differently than non-using individuals. These differences are reflected in behavioral and subjective experiments as well as brain-based experiments which report significant differences in various frontal regions, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and striatum. Together, the results suggest methamphetamine users have an altered experience of negative outcomes, difficulties employing effective emotion regulation, and difficulty engaging in adaptive or goal-directed decision-making. Suggestions for future research to improve our understanding of how negative reinforcement contributes to methamphetamine addiction and to develop effective interventions are provided.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionemotion regulationmethamphetaminenegative reinforcementneuroimagingsubstance use disordertreatment

Identifiers

PMID32256392
PMCPMC7090143
OpenAlexW3010870729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.