Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256374›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Acute Physiological Responses to Resistance Exercise With Continuous Versus Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Eduardo D S Freitas, Ryan M Miller, Aaron D Heishman, João B Ferreira-Júnior, Joamira P Araújo, Michael G Bemben

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07141316 (Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Combined With Electrostimulation After Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07141316 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Combined With Electrostimulation After Knee Arthroplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PaviaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsOsteo Arthritis KneeArmsBlood flow restriction combined with electrostimulation.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Research advances on the effect of resistance training on the rehabilitation of burned children].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Review
  14. Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduardo D S FreitasNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Ryan M MillerNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Aaron D HeishmanNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
João B Ferreira-JúniorKinanthropometry and Human Performance Laboratory, Federal Institute of Sudeste of Minas Gerais, Rio Pomba, Brazil.
Joamira P AraújoKinanthropometry and Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Michael G BembenNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
University of Oklahoma · USInstituto Federal do Sudeste de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goal of this investigation was to examine the physiological responses of blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance exercise (RE) performed with continuous or intermittent BFR and to compare these results to those from conventional high- and low-load RE without BFR. Fourteen men randomly completed the following experimental trials: (1) low-load RE with continuous BFR (cBFR), (2) low-load RE with intermittent BFR (iBFR), (3) low-load RE without BFR (LI), and (4) conventional high-load RE without BFR (HI). For the cBFR, iBFR, and LI exercise trials, participants performed four sets of 30-15-15-15 repetitions of the bilateral leg press (LP) and knee extension (KE) exercises, at an intensity of 20% of their one-repetition maximum (1-RM), at a 1.5-s contraction speed, and with a 1-min rest period between sets. The only difference between the cBFR and iBFR protocols was that the pressure of the cuffs was released during the rest intervals between sets for the iBFR trial. For the HI trial, participants completed four sets of 10 repetitions of the same exercises, at 70% of 1-RM, with a 1-min rest period between sets, and at the same contraction speed. Muscle activity was assessed during each set using superficial electromyography, as well as changes in blood lactate concentration [La

Indexed as

electromyographykaatsulactatemuscle activitymuscle swellingocclusion trainingstrength training

Identifiers

PMID32256374
PMCPMC7090220
OpenAlexW3011326829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.