Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

The Role of the FMN-Domain of Human Cytochrome P450 Oxidoreductase in Its Promiscuous Interactions With Structurally Diverse Redox Partners.

Francisco Esteves, Diana Campelo, Bruno Costa Gomes, Philippe Urban, Sophie Bozonnet, Thomas Lautier, José Rueff, Gilles Truan, Michel Kranendonk

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Delayed gametocyte clearance inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco EstevesCentre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health (ToxOmics), Genetics, Oncology and Huma Toxicology, NOVA Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Diana CampeloCentre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health (ToxOmics), Genetics, Oncology and Huma Toxicology, NOVA Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bruno Costa GomesCentre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health (ToxOmics), Genetics, Oncology and Huma Toxicology, NOVA Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Philippe UrbanCentre National de la Recherche, Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut National des Sciences Appliqu es de Toulouse, Toulouse Biotechnology Institute, Universit de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sophie BozonnetCentre National de la Recherche, Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut National des Sciences Appliqu es de Toulouse, Toulouse Biotechnology Institute, Universit de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Thomas LautierCentre National de la Recherche, Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut National des Sciences Appliqu es de Toulouse, Toulouse Biotechnology Institute, Universit de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
José RueffCentre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health (ToxOmics), Genetics, Oncology and Huma Toxicology, NOVA Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Gilles TruanCentre National de la Recherche, Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut National des Sciences Appliqu es de Toulouse, Toulouse Biotechnology Institute, Universit de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Michel KranendonkCentre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health (ToxOmics), Genetics, Oncology and Huma Toxicology, NOVA Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PTInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NADPH cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (CPR) is the obligatory electron supplier that sustains the activity of microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The variant nature of the isoform-specific proximal interface of microsomal CYPs indicates that CPR is capable of multiple degenerated interactions with CYPs for electron transfer, through different binding mechanisms, and which are still not well-understood. Recently, we showed that CPR dynamics allows formation of open conformations that can be sampled by its structurally diverse redox partners in a CYP-isoform dependent manner. To further investigate the role of the CPR FMN-domain in effective binding of CPR to its diverse acceptors and to clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms, five different CPR-FMN-domain random mutant libraries were created. These libraries were screened for mutants with increased activity when combined with specific CYP-isoforms. Seven CPR-FMN-domain mutants were identified, supporting a gain in activity for CYP1A2 (P117H, G144C, A229T), 2A6 (P117L/L125V, G175D, H183Y), or 3A4 (N151D). Effects were evaluated using extended enzyme kinetic analysis, cytochrome

Indexed as

binding motifscytochrome P450 monooxygenases (CYP)electron transferFMN-domainNADPH cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (CPR)protein–protein interactionredox partner

Identifiers

PMID32256365
PMCPMC7094780
OpenAlexW3011714671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.