Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32256129›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Midwives' and Women's Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study.

Paschal Mdoe, Anita Yeconia, Fanuel Buu, Simeon Kusulla, Ladislaus Blacy, Godfrey Guga, Estomih Mduma, Hussein Kidanto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strengthening Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring during Labor with a Standard Handheld Doppler - Implementation Experience from India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paschal MdoeDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
Anita YeconiaDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
Fanuel BuuDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-5073-0648
Simeon KusullaDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
Ladislaus BlacyDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
Godfrey GugaDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
Estomih MdumaDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-3982
Hussein KidantoDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-9167-8068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe annual global neonatal mortality stands at 2.5 million deaths, 1 million of them dying within the first day of life. An additional 2.6 million are stillborn globally, the majority of them due to intrapartum events. Optimal fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring has the potential to timely detect fetuses at risk and, if coupled with timely obstetric responses may save more newborns. Moyo is a new Doppler with nine crystals capable of monitoring FHR both intermittently and continuously.

aimTo assess women's and midwives' opinions on the use of Moyo for intrapartum FHR monitoring.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire to assess women's and midwives' perception. Women who gave birth at the hospital who used Moyo were interviewed using a questionnaire immediately before discharge from the hospital. Twenty-eight midwives who have been using Moyo for more than 6 months were also interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using excel and result presented in figures.

resultsIn total 113 postpartum women who were monitored using Moyo were interviewed before discharge. Out of these, 46 (40.7%) were first-time mothers and the rest were multipara. In total, 95 women (84.1%) used Moyo and other devices for FHR monitoring, 81 (72%) said Moyo was better than Fetoscopes and handheld Doppler, two-third 75 (66.4%) felt that Moyo was comfortable and 93 (82.3%) would like Moyo to be used on them in the future. Out of 28 midwives, 11 (39.3%) used Moyo continuous only, 3 (10.7%) used Moyo intermittently only and 14 (50.0%) used both intermittent and continuous. Thirteen (46.4%) midwives prefer to use Moyo both intermittent and continuous. Sixteen (55.6%) said Moyo was effective, 21 (75%) felt comfortable to use Moyo, and 13 (46.4%) said Moyo was easy to use.

conclusionThe majority of midwives and women who used Moyo felt that Moyo was comfortable for intrapartum FHR monitoring. Moyo can be used both intermittently and continuously depending on the user's preferences.

Indexed as

fetal heart ratelabormidwivesMoyowomen

Identifiers

PMID32256129
PMCPMC7092687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.