ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020
Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood component therapy for dry eye disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Motugivatrep (SJP-0132) 0.3% Ophthalmic Suspension for Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
- Alleviation of Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms in Participants Treated with a 0.005% Tacrolimus Eye-Drop Solution.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Trial
- Safety, adherence and discontinuation in varenicline solution nasal spray clinical trials for dry eye disease.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Trial
- A Randomised Phase I Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Palovarotene Ophthalmic Solution.Drugs in R&D · 2023Trial
- A Randomized Double-Masked Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Topical Cooling Device for Chronic Ocular Surface Pain.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of acoltremon ophthalmic solution 0.003% and cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion for increased tear production in patients with dry eye disease.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Advances in dry eye disease: from immunopathological mechanisms to emerging ophthalmic drug delivery systems.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Acupuncture combined with auricular acupressure for dry eye: a SPIRIT-guided protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Call to Abandon the Term Dry Eye When We Really Mean Pain.Ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Early Adoption and Utilization of Perfluorohexyloctane for Dry Eye Disease in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Lifitegrast in Treatment of Dry Eye Disease-A Practical, Narrative Expert Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Combined 5% Lifitegrast and Tocopherol Eye Drops in Managing Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Murine Dry Eye.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Preservative-Free Combination of Sodium Hyaluronate and Trehalose Improves Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms and Increases Patient Satisfaction in Real-Life Settings: The TEARS Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Impact of dry eye disease treatment on patient quality of life.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Management of inflammation in dry eye disease: Recommendations from a European panel of experts.European journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Patient Medication Preferences for Managing Dry Eye Disease: The Importance of Medication Side Effects.The patient · 2022Article
- A new non-human primate model of desiccating stress-induced dry eye disease.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Potential Therapeutic Role of Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide for Dry Eye Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with DED were recruited via physician referral to participate in a survey. Current users of CYC or LIF were asked to rate their experience in terms of satisfaction, side effects, and limitation of activities. Switchers of CYC to LIF or LIF to CYC were asked to rate the importance of potential reasons for switching.
resultsSurveys were completed by 207 patients currently treated with CYC (n=98), LIF (n=96), or other DED medications (n=13). Although overall satisfaction with current treatment was high, current users of CYC and LIF reported ineffective relief of DED symptoms (31% and 22%, respectively) and dissatisfaction with the time to onset of effect (29% and 11%). Substantial proportions of patients reported 'sometimes', "usually", or 'always' experiencing the following side effects: burning sensation (72% CYC, 64% LIF), itching (43% CYC, 44% LIF), altered sensation of taste (21% CYC, 56% LIF), blurred vision (37% CYC, 50% LIF), and discharge (28% CYC, 30% LIF). Of the 30 switchers of CYC to LIF and 31 switchers of LIF to CYC, the majority reported inability to relieve DED symptoms as a very or extremely important switching reason. Despite switching, one in four patients were somewhat dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their current medication, with 37% of patients reporting ineffective symptom relief.
conclusionAlthough the rate of overall satisfaction was generally high with both LIF and CYC, many patients were unable to achieve effective symptom relief and commonly experienced side effects. The proportion of patients who were dissatisfied and/or unable to achieve effective symptom relief even after switching suggests the need for additional treatment options for managing DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.