Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32255953›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2020

Post-placental Intrauterine Device Insertion Versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion: An Observational Study.

Nadia Khurshid, Shehnaz Taing, Ambreen Qureshi, Insha Jan Khanyari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia Khurshid1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sher I Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1522-3314
Shehnaz Taing2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lal Ded Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.
Ambreen Qureshi2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lal Ded Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.
Insha Jan Khanyari2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lal Ded Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.
Government Medical College · INSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractImmediate post-placental IUD insertion is defined as IUD insertion within 10 min of the expulsion of the placenta. Although the expulsion rate in post-placental insertion is higher than interval insertion, the benefits of highly effective contraception immediately after delivery may outweigh the risks of expulsion.

aimsTo compare post-placental IUD (PPIUD) insertion with interval IUD insertion (IIUD) in terms of safety, effect on menstrual cycle, efficacy and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter meeting all eligibility criteria, the patients were asked to choose between post-placental IUD insertion and interval/delayed IUD insertion. In PPIUD group, insertion was done within 10 min of expulsion of placenta by hand technique. Individuals in IIUD group were asked to return after 6 weeks for IUD insertion by withdrawal technique. Both the groups were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months by history, physical examination, per speculum examination and ultrasonography. OBSERVATIONS: 238 patients were allocated to PPIUD group and 273 to IIUD group. In the PPIUD group, there was no bleeding/spotting demonstrable as it was masked by the lochia. Mild pain at insertion was seen in only 11 patients in the PPIUD group. Slight bleeding/spotting was seen in 7.8% patients in the IIUD group, while mild to moderate pain was seen in 39.9% patients. At 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year follow up with regard to patients complaining of pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Our study found that irregular bleeding or spotting was more in interval insertion than in the post-placental group. The difference in the two groups was statistically significant at 6 weeks and 6 months, but was not significant at 1 year. There was no case of perforation in either group. Our study found a statistically significant difference in expulsion after post-placental compared to delayed insertion. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (

conclusionPPIUD is a safe, easy and effective alternative to interval IUD insertion and qualifies to be popularized as a first-line contraceptive agent in eligible patients owing to its immediate and sustained contraceptive benefit, patient comfort, convenience and lower incidence of side effects.

Indexed as

ContraceptionDelayed IUCDInterval IUCDIntrauterine contraceptive deviceIUCD expulsionPost-placental

Identifiers

PMID32255953
PMCPMC7109243
OpenAlexW3004572354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.