Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32255793›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Evidence of the absence of human African trypanosomiasis in two northern districts of Uganda: Analyses of cattle, pigs and tsetse flies for the presence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense.

Lucas J Cunningham, Jessica K Lingley, Iñaki Tirados, Johan Esterhuizen, Mercy Opiyo, Clement T N Mangwiro, Mike J Lehane, Stephen J Torr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Lucas J CunninghamDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-4074
Jessica K LingleyDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Iñaki TiradosDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Johan EsterhuizenDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mercy OpiyoInstitute for Global Health, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clement T N MangwiroDepartment of Animal Science, Bindura University of Science Education, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
Mike J LehaneDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Stephen J TorrDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBBindura University of Science Education · ZWManhiça Health Research Centre · MZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale control of sleeping sickness has led to a decline in the number of cases of Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (g-HAT) to <2000/year. However, achieving complete and lasting interruption of transmission may be difficult because animals may act as reservoir hosts for T. b. gambiense. Our study aims to update our understanding of T. b. gambiense in local vectors and domestic animals of N.W. Uganda.

methodsWe collected blood from 2896 cattle and 400 pigs and In addition, 6664 tsetse underwent microscopical examination for the presence of trypanosomes. Trypanosoma species were identified in tsetse from a subsample of 2184 using PCR. Primers specific for T. brucei s.l. and for T. brucei sub-species were used to screen cattle, pig and tsetse samples.

resultsIn total, 39/2,088 (1.9%; 95% CI = 1.9-2.5) cattle, 25/400 (6.3%; 95% CI = 4.1-9.1) pigs and 40/2,184 (1.8%; 95% CI = 1.3-2.5) tsetse, were positive for T. brucei s.l.. Of these samples 24 cattle (61.5%), 15 pig (60%) and 25 tsetse (62.5%) samples had sufficient DNA to be screened using the T. brucei sub-species PCR. Further analysis found no cattle or pigs positive for T. b. gambiense, however, 17/40 of the tsetse samples produced a band suggestive of T. b. gambiense. When three of these 17 PCR products were sequenced the sequences were markedly different to T. b. gambiense, indicating that these flies were not infected with T. b. gambiense.

conclusionThe lack of T. b. gambiense positives in cattle, pigs and tsetse accords with the low prevalence of g-HAT in the human population. We found no evidence that livestock are acting as reservoir hosts. However, this study highlights the limitations of current methods of detecting and identifying T. b. gambiense which relies on a single copy-gene to discriminate between the different sub-species of T. brucei s.l.

Indexed as

Topography, MedicalAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBloodCattleDisease ReservoirsHumansMicroscopyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceSwineTrypanosoma brucei gambienseTrypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesUganda

Identifiers

PMID32255793
PMCPMC7164673
OpenAlexW3014522156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.