Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32255753›Full record

ArticleLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2020

Tracking Early Sentence-Building Progress in Graphic Symbol Communication.

Cathy Binger, Jennifer Kent-Walsh, Nancy Harrington, Quinn C Hollerbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Applying a Developmental Model to Preliterate Aided Language Learning.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic Assessment of AAC Action Verb Symbols for Children with ASD.Advances in neurodevelopmental disorders · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cathy BingerDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Jennifer Kent-WalshSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
Nancy HarringtonSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
Quinn C HollerbachDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
University of Central Florida · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Word by Word: Building Sentences with Preschoolers who use AACR01DC016321 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI BINGER, CATHY, KENT-WALSH, JENNIFER · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Teaching Preschoolers with Complex Communication Needs to Ask Inverted Yes‐No Questions Using an AAC iPad ApplicationR15DC014585 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI KENT-WALSH, JENNIFER · 2016 to 2016
$438k
Teaching Children who use AAC to Produce Rule-Based Semantic-Syntactic RelationsR03DC011610 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI BINGER, CATHY · 2011 to 2013
$423k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016321NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC011610NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC014585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose As is the case with children who rely on spoken language, speech-language pathologists must support and track the expressive language development of children with complex communication needs who use graphic symbols to communicate. This research note presents a framework of the progression of expressive English sentence development using graphic symbols and introduces possible approaches for measuring and analyzing graphic symbol use. Method Current issues in measuring graphic symbol utterances are explored, and a range of measures designed to analyze individual graphic symbol utterances as well as larger samples of utterances are presented. Results Both the Graphic Symbol Utterance and Sentence Development Framework and suggested measures are based on years of graphic symbol intervention research, including two large ongoing research studies of preschoolers with severe speech impairments. Our framework adapts the work of Hadley (2014) to depict expressive language progression from early symbol combinations to childlike and adultlike sentences and highlights developmental patterns unique to graphic symbol productions. Adaptations of existing measures (such as mean length of utterance) as well as measures unique to graphic symbol analyses are presented and discussed. Conclusion To accurately track changes in early graphic symbol utterance growth and complexity, a multidimensional approach, which includes analyses such as symbol relevance, word class diversity, and lexical diversity, is recommended.

Indexed as

Communication Devices for People with DisabilitiesLanguage DevelopmentLanguage TestsLinguisticsNonverbal CommunicationChildChild, PreschoolHumans

Identifiers

PMID32255753
PMCPMC7225017
OpenAlexW3014294651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.