Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32255670›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2020

A Quantile-Based g-Computation Approach to Addressing the Effects of Exposure Mixtures.

Alexander P Keil, Jessie P Buckley, Katie M O'Brien, Kelly K Ferguson, Shanshan Zhao, Alexandra J White

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 768 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
768citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
120.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

768 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,524 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

708 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander P KeilDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jessie P BuckleyDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Katie M O'BrienEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Kelly K FergusonEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Shanshan ZhaoBiostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Alexandra J WhiteEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Environment and Cancer EpidemiologyZIAES103332 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WHITE, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2025
$8.9M
Early Life Phthalate and Perfluoroalkyl Substance Exposures and Childhood Bone HealthR01ES030078 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUCKLEY, JESSIE P · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZ01ES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1999 to 2008
$1.3M
Public health priority setting for environmental metals mixtures and birth defectsR01ES029531 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRY, REBECCA · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES044005NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029531NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure mixtures frequently occur in data across many domains, particularly in the fields of environmental and nutritional epidemiology. Various strategies have arisen to answer questions about exposure mixtures, including methods such as weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression that estimate a joint effect of the mixture components.

objectivesWe demonstrate a new approach to estimating the joint effects of a mixture: quantile g-computation. This approach combines the inferential simplicity of WQS regression with the flexibility of g-computation, a method of causal effect estimation. We use simulations to examine whether quantile g-computation and WQS regression can accurately and precisely estimate the effects of mixtures in a variety of common scenarios.

methodsWe examine the bias, confidence interval (CI) coverage, and bias-variance tradeoff of quantile g-computation and WQS regression and how these quantities are impacted by the presence of noncausal exposures, exposure correlation, unmeasured confounding, and nonlinearity of exposure effects.

resultsQuantile g-computation, unlike WQS regression, allows inference on mixture effects that is unbiased with appropriate CI coverage at sample sizes typically encountered in epidemiologic studies and when the assumptions of WQS regression are not met. Further, WQS regression can magnify bias from unmeasured confounding that might occur if important components of the mixture are omitted from the analysis. DISCUSSION: Unlike inferential approaches that examine the effects of individual exposures while holding other exposures constant, methods like quantile g-computation that can estimate the effect of a mixture are essential for understanding the effects of potential public health actions that act on exposure sources. Our approach may serve to help bridge gaps between epidemiologic analysis and interventions such as regulations on industrial emissions or mining processes, dietary changes, or consumer behavioral changes that act on multiple exposures simultaneously. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5838.

Indexed as

Complex MixturesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHumansLinear ModelsRegression AnalysisComplex MixturesEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID32255670
PMCPMC7228100
OpenAlexW2918173153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.