ArticleRadiology2020
Artificial Intelligence System Approaching Neuroradiologist-level Differential Diagnosis Accuracy at Brain MRI.
Article in Radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.Hepatology international · 2025Guideline
- The application value of Rs-fMRI-based machine learning models for differentiating mild cognitive impairment from Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting histologic grades for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by radiologic image-based artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Radiology Residents: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Trial
- A deep-learning model for identifying fresh vertebral compression fractures on digital radiography.European radiology · 2022Trial
- Agentic AI for scaling diagnosis and care in neurodegenerative disease.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Review of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Seminars in neurology · 2026Review
- Reliability of Large Language Model Generated Clinical Reasoning in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Blinded Comparative Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Early detection of Alzheimer's disease via multimodal MRI and machine learning.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Reliability and diagnostic performance of an automated MRI-based classifier compared with radiologists in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence and advanced imaging in pediatric diffuse midline glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Applying artificial intelligence to rare diseases: a literature review highlighting lessons from Fabry disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Preliminary analysis of the impact of lab results on large language model generated differential diagnoses.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Brain MRI findings in paediatric genetic disorders associated with white matter abnormalities.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Performance Evaluation and Implications of Large Language Models in Radiology Board Exams: Prospective Comparative Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Automated Lesion and Feature Extraction Pipeline for Brain MRIs with Interpretability.Neuroinformatics · 2025Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Although artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise across many aspects of radiology, the use of AI to create differential diagnoses for rare and common diseases at brain MRI has not been demonstrated. Purpose To evaluate an AI system for generation of differential diagnoses at brain MRI compared with radiologists. Materials and Methods This retrospective study tested performance of an AI system for probabilistic diagnosis in patients with 19 common and rare diagnoses at brain MRI acquired between January 2008 and January 2018. The AI system combines data-driven and domain-expertise methodologies, including deep learning and Bayesian networks. First, lesions were detected by using deep learning. Then, 18 quantitative imaging features were extracted by using atlas-based coregistration and segmentation. Third, these image features were combined with five clinical features by using Bayesian inference to develop probability-ranked differential diagnoses. Quantitative feature extraction algorithms and conditional probabilities were fine-tuned on a training set of 86 patients (mean age, 49 years ± 16 [standard deviation]; 53 women). Accuracy was compared with radiology residents, general radiologists, neuroradiology fellows, and academic neuroradiologists by using accuracy of top one, top two, and top three differential diagnoses in 92 independent test set patients (mean age, 47 years ± 18; 52 women). Results For accuracy of top three differential diagnoses, the AI system (91% correct) performed similarly to academic neuroradiologists (86% correct;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.