ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2021
Relationships among classifications of impairment and measures of ambulatory function for children with spina bifida.
Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brazilian Version of the Myelomeningocele Functional Classification (MMFC): Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023Article
- Parent/caregiver's role in nutrition, physical activity, and food access among children diagnosed with spina bifida.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Increased Asymmetry of Trunk, Pelvis, and Hip Motion during Gait in Ambulatory Children with Spina Bifida.Symmetry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine associations between neurosegmental and functional level classifications in children with Spina Bifida, and determine which classification best reflects daily walking activity. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective correlational study was conducted. Children with Spina Bifida were given ratings for lesion level [X-ray and International Myelodysplasia Study Group (IMSG) level determined by muscle strength] and functional level [Hoffer ambulatory level and Dias functional classification of myelomeningocele (FCM), Functional Mobility Scale (FMS)]. Daily walking activity was measured with a StepWatch monitor. Data were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation.
resultsSixty-one children were included, [56% male, average age 9.8 (SD 2.7) years]. The neurosegmental level classifications, X-ray lesion level and IMSG level showed little to no correlation with each other (
conclusionsThe Dias FCM is comprehensive, including elements of neurosegmental level and function, and correlates well with walking activity. We recommend its use for classifying function in patients with Spina Bifida.Implications for rehabilitationFunctional classifications correlate better with daily walking activity than neurosegmental level classifications for patients with Spina Bifida.The Dias FCM includes neurosegmental and functional level elements, correlates well with daily activity, and is recommended for use in classifying Spina Bifida patients.Combined use of the FMS and activity monitoring is recommended for research and clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.