Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32255343›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2020

Free-Base Nicotine Fraction α

James F Pankow, Anna K Duell, David H Peyton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Direct Extraction and Determination of Free Nicotine in Cigarette Smoke.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measurement of the Free-Base Nicotine Fraction (αChemical research in toxicology · 2021
    Article
  8. Determination of (Chemical research in toxicology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James F PankowDepartment of Chemistry Portland, State University Portland, Oregon 97207-0751, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8602-9159
Anna K DuellDepartment of Chemistry Portland, State University Portland, Oregon 97207-0751, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-5162
David H PeytonDepartment of Chemistry Portland, State University Portland, Oregon 97207-0751, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5828-055X

Funding

Toxicant Production and Mitigation in the Electronic-Cigarette Reaction VesselR01ES025257 · NIEHS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STRONGIN, ROBERT M · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
FDA HHSNIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important design aspect of electronic cigarettes ("e-cigarettes") is the nature of the acid/base chemistry in the e-liquid phase. E-liquids having formulations similar to those of early products are mixes of propylene glycol/glycerol (PG/GL) plus free-base (fb) nicotine and (usually) flavor chemicals that are either rather weak or non-acid/base actors in PG/GL. The fraction of nicotine in the fb form is denoted (α

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsBenzaldehydesBenzoic AcidGlycerolHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLevulinic AcidsNicotinePropylene GlycolProtonsSolutionsWaterBenzaldehydesBenzoic AcidGlycerollevulinic acidLevulinic AcidsNicotinePropylene GlycolProtonsSolutionsvanillinWater

Identifiers

PMID32255343
PMCPMC9968495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.