Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32254004›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2020

Progress in adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights globally between 1990 and 2016: what progress has been made, what contributed to this, and what are the implications for the future?

Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Elsie Akwara, Danielle Engel, Marina Plessons, Mengistu Asnake, Sunil Mehra, Bruce Dick, Jane Ferguson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elevating and empowering reproductive futures: Pediatric and adolescent gynecology's specialized care across the globe.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Venkatraman Chandra-MouliResearch Scientist, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization/Human Reproduction Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elsie AkwaraIndependent Expert, Geneva.
Danielle EngelTechnical Specialist, Sexual and Reproductive Health Division, Technical Branch, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York, NY, USA.
Marina PlessonsConsultant, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization/Human Reproduction Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mengistu AsnakeSenior Country Director, Pathfinder International, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sunil MehraPaediatrician, Mamta Health Institute for Mother and Child, New Delhi, India.
Bruce DickIndependent Expert, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jane FergusonIndependent Expert, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary is in response to a paper published in the Lancet entitled: "Progress in adolescent health and well-being: tracking 12 headline indicators for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016" (Peter Azzopardi et al, 2019). We agree with the authors' overall conclusions that although there has been progress in some health outcomes, health risks and social determinants, the situation has worsened in other areas. Other important messages emerge from studying the data with an adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) lens. First, notable - albeit uneven - progress in all the ASRHR indicators has occurred in multi-burden countries. Second, while we cannot assign a cause-effect relationship, it is reasonable to suggest that in addition to secular trends, deliberate global and national investment and action have contributed to and/or accelerated these changes. Third, progress in ASRHR in the multi-burden countries contrasts sharply with increases in rates of tobacco use, binge drinking and overweight and obesity, in all categories of countries. Based on these observations, we submit five implications for action: the adolescent health community must recognize the progress made in ASRHR; acknowledge that increasing investment and action in ASRHR has contributed to these tangible results, which has the potential to grow; build on the gains in ASRHR through concerted action and a focus on implementation science; expand the adolescent health agenda in a progressive and strategic manner; and contribute to wider efforts to respond to adolescents' health needs within the rapidly changing context of the worlds they live in.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthReproductive HealthReproductive RightsSexual HealthAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSocial Determinants of Healthadolescent reproductive healthadolescent well-beinglow- and middle-income countriesmulti-burden countriesprogrammesreproductive healthsexual health

Identifiers

PMID32254004
PMCPMC7888102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.