ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2020
Erratum to: Catalpol ameliorates LPS-induced endometritis by inhibiting inflammation and TLR4/NF-κB signaling.
Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of pruritus and advances in traditional Chinese medicine therapy (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Puerarin inhibits Staphylococcus aureus-induced endometritis through attenuating inflammation and ferroptosis via regulating the P2X7/NLRP3 signalling pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erratum to: J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2019 2019 20(10):816-827. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1900071. The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. In p.823, Figs. 8c and 8d were in-correct, and the obvious pathological changes were mistakenly placed in the picture. The correct versions should be as follows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.