ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020
Blueprint for mechanistic, data-rich early phase clinical pharmacology studies in dermatology.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mild psoriasis as a suitable model for proof-of-mechanism in a phase 1B setting: Results from a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with guselkumab.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Multi-omics profiling of chronic immune-mediated skin diseases: SKINERGY protocol and strategic evaluation.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Observational
- Clinical Validation of Imaging Biomarkers in Mycosis Fungoides.Experimental dermatology · 2026Article
- Intradermal substance P as a challenge agent in healthy individuals.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- The vulvar microbiome in lichen sclerosus and high-grade intraepithelial lesions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Anti-interleukin-17A for pityriasis rubra pilaris: catching the psoriasis biologic wave.The British journal of dermatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.