ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2020
Comparing the Attention Score Between American and European Cardiology Guidelines.
Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Examining the Effectiveness of Social Media for the Dissemination of Research Evidence for Health and Social Care Practitioners: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe American College of Cardiology (ACC) in USA and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in Europe have issued around 25 practice cardiology guidelines since 2008. The attention and impact of these guidelines have not been investigated yet.
aimIn this study, we aim to compare the attention brought up by ACC and ESC guidelines.
methodsGuideline documents were defined as documents published by either the ACC or the ESC, where recommendations with a specific level of evidence are clearly indicated. These documents were posted on their respective websites. For each document, we extracted the attention on blogs, news, social media, and other platforms to calculate a total score known as the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). Then we compared AAS, citations, and other indices between ACC and ESC guideline documents.
resultsA total of 26 US and 24 European cardiology guidelines were released between 2008 and 2018. We found a significant difference in the median AAS between American and European guidelines (p = 0.048). The median AAS for European and for American guidelines were 159 (104.25-392.5) and 79 (24-169.75), respectively. The US Contribution to the AAS was significantly higher than the European in both the European guidelines (p < 0.001, median contribution values were 7.6% vs 3.4%, respectively), and the American guidelines (p = 0.011, median contribution values were 12% vs 7%, respectively).
conclusionThe attention brought up by the European guideline documents was higher than the American guidelines, although most of the attention in both guidelines was contributed to by USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32253743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.