Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253722›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2020

Pharmacovigilance Reports Received from Children and Young People, and Development of Information to Aid Future Reporting from this Age Group.

Nikita Bhoombla, Jennifer Preston, Jenny Ainsworth, Helena Bird, Mitul Jadeja, Charlotte King, Daniel B Hawcutt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikita BhoomblaUniversity of Liverpool Medical School, Liverpool, UK.
Jennifer PrestonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jenny AinsworthNIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Helena BirdMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Mitul JadejaMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Charlotte KingUniversity of Liverpool Medical School, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel B HawcuttDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. D.Hawcutt@liverpool.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the contribution of children and young people (CYP) to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card Scheme (YCS), and to develop age appropriate information with CYP through focus groups to help aid future reporting by this cohort.

methodsReports for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients < 19 years of age received by the MHRA YCS from 1 January 2008 to 29 November 2018 were collated and analysed. Consultation activities with CYP from regional, national and international groups were undertaken from November 2017 to July 2018 to develop CYP-appropriate information from current available literature about reporting ADRs to the YCS.

resultsCYP contributed 2.3% of YCS reports for patients < 19 years (948 self-reports from a total of 41,630 YCS reports). Patients from 10 years of age contributed YCS reports, and the number of CYP reports represented in the total YCS reports rose by 3% in October 2018 compared with the previous year. Self-reported YCS from the CYP contain different suspected medications and reactions compared with YCS reported on behalf of patients aged < 19 years. The most reported medicines by self-reported YCS from CYP were adolescent vaccinations (such as the human papilloma virus [HPV] vaccine, n = 69), oral contraceptives, acne medication, anti-infectives, and antidepressants. The most commonly reported suspected ADRs submitted by CYP to the YCS were headache (n = 107), nausea and fatigue. CYP-generated reports included alternative suspected ADRs compared with adult reports about ADRs in CYP; these included depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. The second part of the study used focus groups involving CYP from various backgrounds to develop two information leaflets regarding reporting suspected ADRs in the YCS; this was highlighted in phase I by CYP who identified divergent information needs dependent on age. Phase II-VI updated and improved the relevant information required for both age groups in a succinct and satisfactory manner. Overall, more than 300 CYP contributed to the development of the information.

conclusionsCYP's contribution to the YCS is limited, but increasing, and demonstrates distinct patterns of suspected medications and reactions. Age-appropriate information for CYP to aid reporting of suspected ADRs has been developed.

Indexed as

PharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsChildFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.