Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253656›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2020

Why Some Sports Bettors Think Gambling Addiction Prevented Them from Becoming Winners? A Qualitative Approach to Understanding the Role of Knowledge in Sports Betting Products.

Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez, Mark D Griffiths, Ana Estévez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hibai Lopez-GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Feixa Llarga s/n, Hospitalet del Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Spain. hlopez@idibell.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1249-2623
Mark D GriffithsInternational Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-6524
Ana EstévezPsychology Department, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESNottingham Trent University · GBUniversidad de Deusto · ES

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017 BP00035Eusko Jaurlaritza POS_2015_1_0062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sports betting products rely upon a balance between their knowledge and chance based structural characteristics. The emphasis by bookmakers on mastering the knowledge-based elements to become winners poses significant challenges for those seeking help for gambling disorder. Bettors find difficulties in integrating their preconceptions about the role of knowledge and skills in winning, into the new cognitive restructuring fostered by cognitive-behavioural therapy. Using a grounded theory approach, this study collected data from 43 Spanish sports bettors undergoing treatment for gambling disorder. The results suggest sports bettors neutralize some gambling-related cognitive distortions during CBT but retain others. Sports bettors try to eliminate them but encounter external validation to retain them, as well as internal incongruences to integrate them into a coherent understanding of how gambling works. The results are discussed with the aim of providing practical guidance as to how skill versus chance related persistent cognitions can be addressed in CBT.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyGamblingHumansInternal-External ControlMalePersuasive CommunicationRisk-TakingSportsCognitive-behavioural therapyGamblingGambling disorderKnowledgeSkillSports betting

Identifiers

PMID32253656
OpenAlexW3014344948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.