ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020
Intelligent Robotics Incorporating Machine Learning Algorithms for Improving Functional Capacity Evaluation and Occupational Rehabilitation.
Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of AI/ML applications in multi-domain robotic rehabilitation: trends, gaps, and future directions.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Attitudes, Needs, and Expectations Regarding the Application of AI in Occupational Healthcare: A Multiple Stakeholder Perspective.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- The SEWAbility system: a video-based job analysis framework for understanding task-specific job demands.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of hidden subtypes in occupational health examinations and their biomedical characteristics using graph-enhanced deep representation learning.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Stakeholder perspectives on job analysis for disability-inclusive sewing employment in China: a qualitative content analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- User-Centred Design to Inform Requirements for a Remotely Administered Hybrid Functional Test (RAHFT) Protocol.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A deep learning model for assistive decision-making during robot-aided rehabilitation therapies based on therapists' demonstrations.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Approaches for the Use of AI in Workplace Health Promotion and Prevention: Systematic Scoping Review.JMIR AI · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Revolutionary Role in Physical and Mental Rehabilitation: A Review of Recent Advancements.BioMed research international · 2024Review
- Home-Based Rehabilitation of the Shoulder Using Auxiliary Systems and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- The telehealth program of occupational therapy among older people: an up-to-date scoping review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Quantitative Evaluation System of Wrist Motor Function for Stroke Patients Based on Force Feedback.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Case Report: Utilizing AI and NLP to Assist with Healthcare and Rehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Review: How Can Intelligent Robots and Smart Mechatronic Modules Facilitate Remote Assessment, Assistance, and Rehabilitation for Isolated Adults With Neuro-Musculoskeletal Conditions?Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Review
- Machine Learning for Work Disability Prevention: Introduction to the Special Series.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Ethical Considerations of Using Machine Learning for Decision Support in Occupational Health: An Example Involving Periodic Workers' Health Assessments.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Occupational rehabilitation often involves functional capacity evaluations (FCE) that use simulated work tasks to assess work ability. Currently, there exists no single, streamlined solution to simulate all or a large number of standard work tasks. Such a system would improve FCE and functional rehabilitation through simulating reaching maneuvers and more dexterous functional tasks that are typical of workplace activities. This paper reviews efforts to develop robotic FCE solutions that incorporate machine learning algorithms. Methods We reviewed the literature regarding rehabilitation robotics, with an emphasis on novel techniques incorporating robotics and machine learning into FCE. Results Rehabilitation robotics aims to improve the assessment and rehabilitation of injured workers by providing methods for easily simulating workplace tasks using intelligent robotic systems. Machine learning-based approaches combine the benefits of robotic systems with the expertise and experience of human therapists. These innovations have the potential to improve the quantification of function as well as learn the haptic interactions provided by therapists to assist patients during assessment and rehabilitation. This is done by allowing a robot to learn based on a therapist's motions ("demonstrations") what the desired workplace activity ("task") is and how to recreate it for a worker with an injury ("patient"). Through Telerehabilitation and internet connectivity, these robotic assessment techniques can be used over a distance to reach rural and remote locations. Conclusions While the research is in the early stages, robotics with integrated machine learning algorithms have great potential for improving traditional FCE practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32253595What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.