Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253491›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2020

Proatlas anomalies in craniofacial malformations: 5-year experience in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

Rattabhorn Montrisaet, Sasitorn Petcharunpaisan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Atlas invagination through the foramen magnum: expanding the spectrum of craniovertebral junction malformations.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rattabhorn MontrisaetDivision of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. r.montrisaet@gmail.com.
Sasitorn PetcharunpaisanDivision of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the prevalences of proatlas anomalies in craniofacial malformations and evaluate the relation between craniofacial malformation and proalast anomalies.

methodsThe 221 patients with craniofacial malformation who underwent CT facial bone and 3D brain in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH). Then, the craniofacial malformed patients are classified into six groups composed of craniosynostosis, cephalocele, midface anomaly, facial and branchial arch syndrome, facial cleft face, and others. Reviewing image finding by the researcher and the radiologist advisor was done separately and gave the consensus in the case with disagreement. Qualitative analysis of the prevalence of proatlas anomalies was achieved. In addition, assessment of the relationship between craniofacial malformation and proatlas anomalies was conducted using Pearson's chi-square test to determine statistical significance.

resultThe proatlas anomalies were presented in 26 patients of 221 craniofacial malformed patients. Details of frequentative proatlas anomalies consist of pre-basioccipital arch in eight patients, os odontoideum in five patients, bony mass along the margin of foramen magnum in three patients, atlas assimilation in two patients, hypertrophic occipital condyle in one patient, third occipital condyle in one patient, and mixed characteristic of proatlas anomalies in six patients. These results represented pre-basioccipital arch and os odontoideum as the two most common presentations among proatlas anomalies and also showed significant existence of proatlas diseases in craniofacial malformation (p value = 0.006).

conclusionOur results emphasize the existence of proatlas anomalies which should be carefully looked for, particularly in craniofacial malformed patients due to significant statistical correlation.

Indexed as

Craniofacial AbnormalitiesOccipital BoneEncephaloceleForamen MagnumHospitalsHumansCraniovertebral malformationOs odontoideumPre-basioccipital archProatlas segmental anomalies

Identifiers

PMID32253491
OpenAlexW3015025031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.