ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Species-Specific Identification of Streptococcus based on DNA Marker in 16S-23S rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene Factors and Serotypes Related to Polysaccharide and Protein-Based Candidate Vaccines AmongCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Effects of non-chlorine antimicrobial agents on microbial diversity in yellow-feathered chickens during mixed precooling.Food science of animal resources · 2026Article
- Microbial signatures of dental caries in the incarcerated elderly: a salivary microbiota study in a restricted environment.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Improving bacteria identification from digital melt assay via oligonucleotide-based temperature calibration.Analytica chimica acta · 2024Article
- Species-specific identification of Pseudomonas based on 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and its combined application with next-generation sequencing.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Streptococcus is closely correspondent to human. The accurate species-specific identification method of Streptococcus is important for the bacteria clinical diagnosis, molecular epidemiological analysis, and microecological study. In the last decades, DNA markers are widely utilized for identification of prokaryotic species. However, 16S rDNA, the most popular bacterial DNA marker, cannot properly distinguish closely related Streptococcus species. In present study, we employed 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence to explore the species-specific DNA marker. We predicted the secondary structure of Streptococcus ITS sequence transcribed products. Then we identified that the specific and consensus sequences in the primary structure can be found occupying an individual subunit in the secondary structure, which explained the foundation of the mosaic-like structure of ITS. We evaluated the specificity of ITS in Streptococcus, and found that the specificity can be detected by a further analysis of a BLAST result. Then, we developed an identification procedure based on the ITS sequence. We verified the procedure by 500 ITS sequence. The accuracy rate of this procedure was 100% for Streptococcus at genus level, and 99.3% at species level. It suggested that ITS can be utilized to accurately identify Streptococcus at the species level. This work suggests that further exploration of ITS could be applied in other bacterial genera for identification and classification, which may be a useful topic for future microbiology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.