Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253358›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Similar Microglial Cell Densities across Brain Structures and Mammalian Species: Implications for Brain Tissue Function.

Sandra E Dos Santos, Marcelle Medeiros, Jairo Porfirio, William Tavares, Leila Pessôa, Lea Grinberg, Renata E P Leite, Renata E L Ferretti-Rebustini, Claudia K Suemoto, Wilson Jacob Filho and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Decoding Alzheimer's Disease One Cell Class at a Time.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. One Biology and the Status of Humans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Brain-Resident Immune Cells in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. The Neuroimmune System and the Cerebellum.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  18. Hypothalamic neuronal-glial crosstalk in metabolic disease.npj metabolic health and disease · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandra E Dos SantosDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240.
Marcelle MedeirosInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.
Jairo PorfirioInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-6212
William TavaresInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.
Leila PessôaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.
Lea GrinbergMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158.
Renata E P LeiteBiobank for Aging Studies, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 01246-903, Brazil.
Renata E L Ferretti-RebustiniBiobank for Aging Studies, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 01246-903, Brazil.
Claudia K SuemotoBiobank for Aging Studies, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 01246-903, Brazil.
Wilson Jacob FilhoBiobank for Aging Studies, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 01246-903, Brazil.
Stephen C NoctorSchool of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95817.
Chet C SherwoodDepartment of Anthropology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
Jon H KaasDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240.
Paul R MangerSchool of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, 2000, South Africa, Johannesburg.
Suzana Herculano-HouzelDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240 suzana.herculano@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-3599
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRVanderbilt University · USGeorge Washington University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglial cells play essential volume-related actions in the brain that contribute to the maturation and plasticity of neural circuits that ultimately shape behavior. Microglia can thus be expected to have similar cell sizes and even distribution both across brain structures and across species with different brain sizes. To test this hypothesis, we determined microglial cell densities (the inverse of cell size) using immunocytochemistry to Iba1 in samples of free cell nuclei prepared with the isotropic fractionator from brain structures of 33 mammalian species belonging to males and females of five different clades. We found that microglial cells constitute ∼7% of non-neuronal cells in different brain structures as well as in the whole brain of all mammalian species examined. Further, they vary little in cell density compared with neuronal cell densities within the cerebral cortex, across brain structures, across species within the same clade, and across mammalian clades. As a consequence, we find that one microglial cell services as few as one and as many as 100 neurons in different brain regions and species, depending on the local neuronal density. We thus conclude that the addition of microglial cells to mammalian brains is governed by mechanisms that constrain the size of these cells and have remained conserved over 200 million years of mammalian evolution. We discuss the probable consequences of such constrained size for brain function in health and disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainCell CountFemaleMaleMammalsMicrogliaSpecies Specificitycell densitycell numberscomparativeevolutionmicroglia

Identifiers

PMID32253358
PMCPMC7294795
OpenAlexW3014133488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.