Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253312›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Metrics that matter for assessing the ocean biological carbon pump.

Ken O Buesseler, Philip W Boyd, Erin E Black, David A Siegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The molecular-level diagenetic clock of sinking marine organic matter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biogenic carbon pool production maintains the Southern Ocean carbon sink.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ken O BuesselerDepartment of Marine Chemistry & Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543; kbuesseler@whoi.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-8796
Philip W BoydInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7850-1911
Erin E BlackDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-7531
David A SiegelEarth Research Institute and Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-3055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological carbon pump (BCP) comprises wide-ranging processes that set carbon supply, consumption, and storage in the oceans' interior. It is becoming increasingly evident that small changes in the efficiency of the BCP can significantly alter ocean carbon sequestration and, thus, atmospheric CO

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemOceans and SeasCarbonCarbon DioxideHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsSeawaterCarbonCarbon DioxideMembrane Transport Proteinsbiological carbon pumpparticle fluxtwilight zone

Identifiers

PMID32253312
PMCPMC7211944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.