Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253254›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2020

Model systems for regeneration:

Donald T Fox, Erez Cohen, Rachel Smith-Bolton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Draper-mediated efferocytosis bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donald T FoxDepartment of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-179X
Erez CohenDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-3707
Rachel Smith-BoltonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA rsbolton@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2196-8275

Funding

ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF CELLULAR STRUCTUREST32GM007184 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1985 to 2019
$18.2M
Polyploidy after tissue injury: a Drosophila modelR01GM118447 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOX, DONALD T. · 2016 to 2025
$3.1M
Regulation of Cell Fate and Patterning During Regenerative GrowthR01GM107140 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SMITH-BOLTON, RACHEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107140NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118447NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaHumansRegenerationSignal TransductionWound HealingDrosophilaGermlineImaginal discIntestineRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID32253254
PMCPMC7157589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.