Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253246›Full record

ArticleESMO open2020

Prognostic nomogram based on the metastatic lymph node ratio for gastric neuroendocrine tumour: SEER database analysis.

Jinluan Li, Yaobin Lin, Youjia Wang, Huaqin Lin, Feifei Lin, Qingyang Zhuang, Xijin Lin, Junxin Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinluan Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University. Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China.
Yaobin Lin *Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Youjia WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Huaqin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Feifei LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qingyang ZhuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xijin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Junxin WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China junxinwufj@aliyun.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-2338
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe prediction of survival of gastric neuroendocrine tumours (g-NETs) is controversial. Prognostic effects of the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with g-NET were explored, and a nomogram was plotted to predict the survival rates of patients.

methodsA longitudinal study conducted on the basis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The association between LNR and survival were investigated by using Pearson correlation and Cox regression. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were predicted with the help of nomograms.

resultsA total of 315 patients with g-NET diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 were included in this study. LNR was discovered to have a negative correlation with OS and CSS (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.343 (p<0.001) and 0.389 (p<0.001), respectively). The multivariate analyses indicated age, tumour site, differentiation, T staging, M staging, chemotherapy and LNR to be independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. Surgery was also a prognostic determinant for CSS (p=0.003). Concordance indices of the nomograms for OS and CSS were higher than those of the TNM classification (0.772 vs 0.730 and 0.807 vs 0.768, respectively). As per the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, predictive ability of the nomograms for survival of 1, 3 and 5 years was all better than that of TNM classification.

conclusionsLNR is an independent predictor of g-NETs. The nomograms plotted in this study have a satisfying predictive ability of survival risks and are capable of guiding tailored treatment strategies for patients with g-NET.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsLongitudinal StudiesLymph Node RatioMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsNomogramsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSEER ProgramStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Analysiscancer-specific survivalgastric neuroendocrine tumorlymph node ratiooverall survivalSEER database

Identifiers

PMID32253246
PMCPMC7174016
OpenAlexW3015004022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.