Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253189›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Association between National Early Warning Scores in primary care and clinical outcomes: an observational study in UK primary and secondary care.

Lauren J Scott, Niamh M Redmond, Alison Tavaré, Hannah Little, Seema Srivastava, Anne Pullyblank

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Be-SNAP: the Belgian Sepsis National Action Plan.Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors associated with potentially missed acute deterioration in primary care: cohort study of UK general practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Implementation of the National Early Warning Score in patients with suspicion of sepsis: evaluation of a system-wide quality improvement project.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  19. What's behind the NEWS? National Early Warning Scores in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  20. Viewpoint: What's the NEWS? Supporting the identification of the deteriorating patient.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren J ScottNational Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Niamh M RedmondNational Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Alison TavaréWest of England Academic Health Science Network, Bristol.
Hannah LittleWest of England Academic Health Science Network, Bristol.
Seema SrivastavaNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol.
Anne PullyblankNorth Bristol NHS Trust, and medical director, West of England Academic Health Science Network, Bristol; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNHS England has mandated use of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), more recently NEWS2, in acute settings, and suggested its use in primary care. However, there is reluctance from GPs to adopt NEWS/NEWS2.

aimTo assess whether NEWS calculated at the point of GP referral into hospital is associated with outcomes in secondary care. DESIGN AND

settingAn observational study using routinely collected data from primary and secondary care.

methodNEWS values were prospectively collected for 13 047 GP referrals into acute care between July 2017 and December 2018. NEWS values were examined and multivariate linear and logistic regression used to assess associations with process measures and clinical outcomes.

resultsHigher NEWS values were associated with faster conveyance for patients travelling by ambulance, for example, median 94 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 69-139) for NEWS ≥7; median 132 minutes, (IQR 84-236) for NEWS = 0 to 2); faster time from hospital arrival to medical review (54 minutes [IQR 25-114] for NEWS ≥7; 78 minutes [IQR 34-158] for NEWS = 0 to 2); as well as increased length of stay (5 days [IQR 2-11] versus 1 day [IQR 0-5]); intensive care unit admissions (2.0% versus 0.5%); sepsis diagnosis (11.7% versus 2.5%); and mortality, for example, 30-day mortality 12.0% versus 4.1% for NEWS ≥7 versus NEWS = 0 to 2, respectively. On average, for patients referred without a NEWS value (NEWS = NR), most clinical outcomes were comparable with patients with NEWS = 3 to 4, but ambulance conveyance time and time to medical review were comparable with patients with NEWS = 0 to 2.

conclusionThis study has demonstrated that higher NEWS values calculated at GP referral into hospital are associated with a faster medical review and poorer clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScoreEnglandHumansPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSecondary Health CareUnited Kingdomcontinuity of caregeneral practicenational early warning scorepatient safetyprimary careroutinely collected datasecondary care

Identifiers

PMID32253189
PMCPMC7141816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.