Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32253158›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2020

Enabling people with dementia to access and receive cancer treatment and care: The crucial role of supportive networks.

Claire A Surr, Rachael Kelley, Alys W Griffiths, Laura Ashley, Fiona Cowdell, Ann Henry, Michelle Collinson, Ellen Mason, Amanda J Farrin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Navigating cancer treatment and care when living with comorbid dementia: an ethnographic study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claire A SurrCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: c.a.surr@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Rachael KelleyCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: r.kelley@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Alys W GriffithsCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: Alys.Griffiths@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Laura AshleySchool of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: l.j.ashley@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Fiona CowdellFaculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: fiona.cowdell@bcu.ac.uk.
Ann HenryClinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: a.henry@leeds.ac.uk.
Michelle CollinsonClinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: m.collinson@leeds.ac.uk.
Ellen MasonClinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: e.mason1@leeds.ac.uk.
Amanda J FarrinClinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: a.j.farrin@leeds.ac.uk.
Leeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBBirmingham City University · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0816-20015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite cancer and dementia being conditions in which prevalence increases with age, there remains limited research on the cancer treatment and care needs of this population. Our study aimed to address this gap and this paper reports on the role of supportive networks in enabling people with dementia to access cancer treatment and care. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn ethnographic study involving seventeen people with cancer and dementia, 22 relatives and nineteen oncology staff. It comprised observations (46 h) of and informal conversations during oncology appointments attended by people with dementia and their relatives and semi-structured interviews (n = 37) with people living with cancer and dementia, their relatives and staff working in various roles across oncology services. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsPatients and oncology staff relied on and expected relatives to provide practical and emotional support around cancer treatment and care. Families varied in their ability to provide required support due to extent of the family network, practical issues, knowledge of the patient and their wishes, family conflict and the patient's willingness to accept help. Where no family network was available, support provision was complex and this could compromise access to cancer treatment.

conclusionsPeople with comorbid cancer and dementia rely heavily on a supportive family network to access treatment and care. Oncology services need to assess the supportive networks available to individual patients in developing cancer treatment plans. Urgent consideration needs to be given to how those with no family networks can be appropriately supported.

Indexed as

DementiaNeoplasmsCaregiversCommunicationHumansAlzheimer's diseaseCancerCareDementiaEthnographyFamily carersOncologySupportSupport networksTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32253158
PMCPMC7544010
OpenAlexW3014439939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.