Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252988›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020

Improved survival after lung transplantation for adults requiring preoperative invasive mechanical ventilation: A national cohort study.

Barbara C S Hamilton, Gabriela R Dincheva, Michael A Matthay, Steven Hays, Jonathan P Singer, Marek Brzezinski, Jasleen Kukreja

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara C S HamiltonDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif. Electronic address: Barbara.hamilton@ucsf.edu.
Gabriela R DinchevaDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Michael A MatthayDepartment of Medicine, Anesthesia and the Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Steven HaysDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Jonathan P SingerDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Marek BrzezinskiDepartment of Anesthesia, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Jasleen KukrejaDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

The Effects of Lung Transplant on Disability and Health-Related Quality of LifeK23HL111115 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SINGER, JONATHAN PAUL · 2012 to 2016
$832k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL111115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly survival after lung transplantation has improved in the last decade. Mechanically ventilated recipients are known to be at greater risk for early post-transplant mortality. We hypothesized that post-transplant survival in mechanically ventilated recipients has improved over time.

methodsUsing a national registry, we compared hazard of death at 30 days, 4 and 14 months, 3 and 5 years, and overall for adults on mechanical ventilation who underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation from May 4, 2011, to April 4, 2018 (modern group) with those undergoing transplantation from May 4, 2005, to May 3, 2011 (early group). We quantified the impact of mechanical ventilation on survival using population-attributable fractions. We also compared mechanically ventilated recipients with nonmechanically ventilated recipients.

resultsMechanically ventilated recipients from the modern group had lower hazard of death than recipients in the early group at all time-points, lowest at 30-days post-transplant (hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.08). In the modern period, mechanically ventilated recipients had greater hazard of death than nonmechanically ventilated recipients at 30 days' post-transplant (9.53; 4.57-19.86). For mechanically ventilated recipients, the population attributable fraction was lower in the modern group compared to the earlier group (0.6% vs 5.7%).

conclusionsWhile mechanically ventilated recipients remain at high risk, survival in this patient population has improved over time. This may reflect improvements in perioperative recipient management.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceRegistriesAdultCystic FibrosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsUnited Stateslung transplantationmechanical ventilationmodern eraperioperative caresurvival

Identifiers

PMID32252988
PMCPMC7485564
OpenAlexW3010091680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.