ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
Improved survival after lung transplantation for adults requiring preoperative invasive mechanical ventilation: A national cohort study.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung transplantation outcomes in candidates aged ≥ 70 years old: A 10-year single center experience.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Lung Transplantation for Bronchiolitis Obliterans after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared with Those for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Waitlist Mortality and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridge to Lung Transplant.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Frailty in Lung Transplantation: Candidate Assessment and Optimization.Transplantation · 2021Article
- Biotrauma during ultra-low tidal volume ventilation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: a randomized crossover clinical trial.Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- A year in general thoracic surgery published in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery: 2020.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEarly survival after lung transplantation has improved in the last decade. Mechanically ventilated recipients are known to be at greater risk for early post-transplant mortality. We hypothesized that post-transplant survival in mechanically ventilated recipients has improved over time.
methodsUsing a national registry, we compared hazard of death at 30 days, 4 and 14 months, 3 and 5 years, and overall for adults on mechanical ventilation who underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation from May 4, 2011, to April 4, 2018 (modern group) with those undergoing transplantation from May 4, 2005, to May 3, 2011 (early group). We quantified the impact of mechanical ventilation on survival using population-attributable fractions. We also compared mechanically ventilated recipients with nonmechanically ventilated recipients.
resultsMechanically ventilated recipients from the modern group had lower hazard of death than recipients in the early group at all time-points, lowest at 30-days post-transplant (hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.08). In the modern period, mechanically ventilated recipients had greater hazard of death than nonmechanically ventilated recipients at 30 days' post-transplant (9.53; 4.57-19.86). For mechanically ventilated recipients, the population attributable fraction was lower in the modern group compared to the earlier group (0.6% vs 5.7%).
conclusionsWhile mechanically ventilated recipients remain at high risk, survival in this patient population has improved over time. This may reflect improvements in perioperative recipient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.