Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252805›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Impact of phages on soil bacterial communities and nitrogen availability under different assembly scenarios.

Lucas P P Braga, Aymé Spor, Witold Kot, Marie-Christine Breuil, Lars H Hansen, João C Setubal, Laurent Philippot

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of defensome genes and mobile genetic Elements in different types of pasture soil agroecosystems from the Brazilian Amazon.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Positive bacteria-phage interactions drive sulfamethoxazole removal.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucas P P BragaUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INRA, AgroSup Dijon, Agroécologie, 21000, Dijon, France. lppbraga@iq.usp.br.
Aymé SporUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INRA, AgroSup Dijon, Agroécologie, 21000, Dijon, France.
Witold KotDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Marie-Christine BreuilUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INRA, AgroSup Dijon, Agroécologie, 21000, Dijon, France.
Lars H HansenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
João C SetubalDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laurent PhilippotUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INRA, AgroSup Dijon, Agroécologie, 21000, Dijon, France. laurent.philippot@inra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacteriophages, the viruses infecting bacteria, are biological entities that can control their host populations. The ecological relevance of phages for microbial systems has been widely explored in aquatic environments, but the current understanding of the role of phages in terrestrial ecosystems remains limited. Here, our objective was to quantify the extent to which phages drive the assembly and functioning of soil bacterial communities. We performed a reciprocal transplant experiment using natural and sterilized soil incubated with different combinations of two soil microbial communities, challenged against native and non-native phage suspensions as well as against a cocktail of phage isolates. We tested three different community assembly scenarios by adding phages: (a) during soil colonization, (b) after colonization, and (c) in natural soil communities. One month after inoculation with phage suspensions, bacterial communities were assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon gene sequencing.

resultsBy comparing the treatments inoculated with active versus autoclaved phages, our results show that changes in phage pressure have the potential to impact soil bacterial community composition and diversity. We also found a positive effect of active phages on the soil ammonium concentration in a few treatments, which indicates that increased phage pressure may also be important for soil functions.

conclusionsOverall, the present work contributes to expand the current knowledge about soil phages and provide some empirical evidence supporting their relevance for soil bacterial community assembly and functioning. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsSoil MicrobiologyAmmonium CompoundsBacteriaBacteriophagesEcosystemMicrobiotaNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoilAmmonium CompoundsNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID32252805
PMCPMC7137350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.