Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252789›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2020

PRENACEL partner - use of short message service (SMS) to encourage male involvement in prenatal care: a cluster randomized trial.

Lívia Pimenta Bonifácio, Ana Carolina Arruda Franzon, Fabiani Spessoto Zaratini, Fernanda Bergamini Vicentine, Francisco Barbosa-Júnior, Giordana Campos Braga, Jazmin Andrea Cifuentes Sanchez, Lívia Oliveira-Ciabati, Magna Santos Andrade, Mariana Fernandes and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lívia Pimenta BonifácioDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. livia_pb@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-0304
Ana Carolina Arruda FranzonDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiani Spessoto ZaratiniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Bergamini VicentineDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Barbosa-JúniorDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giordana Campos BragaDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jazmin Andrea Cifuentes SanchezDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lívia Oliveira-CiabatiDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Magna Santos AndradeDepartment of Education, College of Nursing, State University of Bahia (UNEB), Senhor do Bonfim, Bahia, Brazil.
Mariana FernandesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suzi Volpato FabioWomen Health Programme, Ribeirao Preto Health Department, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Geraldo DuarteDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vicky Nogueira PileggiDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Paulo SouzaDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elisabeth Meloni VieiraDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRClinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior -Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe partner has an important role when he participates of the prenatal care as showed in the positive results relate to the mother and the child health. For this reason it is an important strategy to bring future fathers closer to health services and to improve their link with paternity.

aimTo evaluate whether the implementation of SMS technology, through the PRENACEL program for the partner as a health education program, is a useful supplement to the standard prenatal monitoring.

methodsA parallel cluster randomized trial was carried out, with the clusters representing primary care health units. The 20 health units with the largest number of pregnant women in 2013 were selected for the study. There was a balance of the health units according to the size of the affiliated population and the vulnerability situation and these were allocated in intervention and control health units by the randomization. The partners of the pregnant women who started prenatal care prior to the 20th week of gestation were the study population of the intervention group. The participants received periodic short text messages via mobile phone with information about the pregnancy and birth. In the control group units the partners, together with the women, received the standard prenatal care.

resultsOne hundred eighty-six partners were interviewed, 62 from the PRENACEL group, 73 from the intervention group that did not opt ​​for PRENACEL and 51 from the control group. A profile with a mean age of 30 years was found and the majority of respondents (51.3%) declared themselves as brown race/color. The interviewees presented a mean of 9.3 years of study. The majority of the men (95.2%) cohabited with their partner and 63.7% were classified as socioeconomic class C. The adherence to the PRENACEL program was 53.4%. In relation to the individual results, there was a greater participation of the PRENACEL partners in the prenatal consultations, as well as a greater presence of them accompanying the woman at the moment of the childbirth when compared to the other groups.

conclusionThe study showed that a health education strategy using communication technology seems to be a useful prenatal care supplement; the intervention had a good acceptability and has a promising role in men's involvement in prenatal, labour and postpartum care of their partners.

trial registrationClinical trial registry: RBR-54zf73, U1111-1163-7761.

Indexed as

FathersMenPrenatal CareText MessagingAdultBrazilFemaleHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultmHealthPaternal involvementPrenatalSMS textText messaging

Identifiers

PMID32252789
PMCPMC7132868
OpenAlexW3015188240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.