ArticleBMC surgery2020
A novel nomogram to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients after oesophagectomy.
Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prehabilitation Reduces Occurrence of Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy-A Retrospective Cohort Analysis and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Smoking status predicts anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors and Prediction Model of Cervical Anastomotic and Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leakage After Radical Esophagectomy.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Article
- C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Combined and intraoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Ulcer Scarring in the Gastric Conduit Is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- The Predictive Value of PCT and Other Infection Indicators in Postoperative Infection of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- C-Reactive Protein as Predictor for Infectious Complications after Robotic and Open Esophagectomies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Development of nomograms predictive of anastomotic leakage in patients before minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Efficacy of endoscopic filling with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for anastomotic leak after esophageal cancer surgery: identification of an optimal technique.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021Article
- A Novel Nomogram for Prediction of Early Postoperative Complications of Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage is a dangerous postoperative complication of oesophageal surgery. The present study aimed to develop a simple and practical scoring system to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection.
methodsA consecutive series of 330 patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery from January 2016 to January 2018 at the Shanghai Chest Hospital were included to develop a prediction model. Anastomotic leakage was evaluated using oesophagography, computed tomography, or flexible endoscopy. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression based on a generalized linear model was used to select variables for the anastomotic leakage risk model while avoiding overfitting. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build forest plots and a prediction model. The concordance index or the area under the curve was used to judge the discrimination, and calibration plots verified the consistency. Internal validation of the model was conducted, and the clinical usefulness and threshold screening of the model were evaluated by decision curve analysis.
resultsThe factors included in the predictive nomogram included Sex, diabetes history, anastomotic type, reconstruction route, smoking history, CRP level and presence of cardiac arrhythmia. The model displayed a discrimination performance with a concordance index of 0.690 (95% confidence interval: 0.620-0.760) and good calibration. A concordance index value of 0.664 was maintained during the internal validation. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the actual observations and the predicted results.
conclusionThe present prediction model, which requires only seven variables and includes Sex, diabetes history, anastomotic type, reconstruction route, smoking history, CRP level and presence of cardiac arrhythmia, may be useful for predicting anastomotic leakage in patients after oesophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.