Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252738›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2020

A novel nomogram to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients after oesophagectomy.

Chengya Huang, Haixia Yao, Qi Huang, Huijie Lu, Meiying Xu, Jingxiang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Ulcer Scarring in the Gastric Conduit Is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengya HuangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China.
Haixia YaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China.
Qi HuangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China.
Huijie LuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China.
Meiying XuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China.
Jingxiang WuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China. wjx1132@163.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671078Shanghai Municipal Population and Family Planning Commission 201840319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leakage is a dangerous postoperative complication of oesophageal surgery. The present study aimed to develop a simple and practical scoring system to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage after oesophageal resection.

methodsA consecutive series of 330 patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery from January 2016 to January 2018 at the Shanghai Chest Hospital were included to develop a prediction model. Anastomotic leakage was evaluated using oesophagography, computed tomography, or flexible endoscopy. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression based on a generalized linear model was used to select variables for the anastomotic leakage risk model while avoiding overfitting. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build forest plots and a prediction model. The concordance index or the area under the curve was used to judge the discrimination, and calibration plots verified the consistency. Internal validation of the model was conducted, and the clinical usefulness and threshold screening of the model were evaluated by decision curve analysis.

resultsThe factors included in the predictive nomogram included Sex, diabetes history, anastomotic type, reconstruction route, smoking history, CRP level and presence of cardiac arrhythmia. The model displayed a discrimination performance with a concordance index of 0.690 (95% confidence interval: 0.620-0.760) and good calibration. A concordance index value of 0.664 was maintained during the internal validation. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the actual observations and the predicted results.

conclusionThe present prediction model, which requires only seven variables and includes Sex, diabetes history, anastomotic type, reconstruction route, smoking history, CRP level and presence of cardiac arrhythmia, may be useful for predicting anastomotic leakage in patients after oesophagectomy.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakChinaDecision Support TechniquesEsophagectomyEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnastomotic leakageNomogramOesophagus operationPredictors

Identifiers

PMID32252738
PMCPMC7137293
OpenAlexW3014891084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.