Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252733›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Socio-demographic characteristics and associated factors influencing cervical cancer screening among women attending in St. Paul's Teaching and Referral Hospital, Ethiopia.

Abebe Belete Woldetsadik, Abebe Feyissa Amhare, Sintayehu Tsegaye Bitew, Leilei Pei, Jian Lei, Jing Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abebe Belete WoldetsadikSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Abebe Feyissa AmhareSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Sintayehu Tsegaye BitewSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Leilei PeiSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Jian LeiSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Jing HanShenzhen Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, 518057, People's Republic of China. bbbishop@126.com.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

This work was supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Project. JCYJ20170816100755047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Ethiopia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent cancer among women aged 15 to 44 years old. Cervical cancer screening is an effective measure to enhance the early detection of cervical cancer for prevention. However, the magnitude of cervical cancer screening is less than 1%. This study aimed to determine the influence of sociodemographic characteristics and related factors on screening.

methodA hospital-based cross-sectional study has been conducted from July to September 2017. Data have been collected using interviewer-administered questioner among 425 women (18-49 years age) who visited the family health department at St. Paul's Hospital. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used for data analysis.

resultOf the 425 study participants, only 12.2% of women have been screened within the past 3 years. Women in the age range of 40-49 years old were more likely to be screened (36.1%) than women age 18-29 years (8%). Women living in urban were more likely to be screened (15.9%) than women living in rural (3.9%). Other factors including low monthly income, unlikely chance of having cancer, lack of knowledge, and fear test outcome were significantly associated with the low uptake of screening.

conclusionThis study revealed that the uptake of cervical cancer screening was low. Women in the potential target population of cervical cancer screening were just a proportion of all studied age groups and screening in them was more common than in younger women. Besides, rural residence, low monthly income, and lack of knowledge were important predictors for low utilization of cervical cancer screening practice.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPregnancyReferral and ConsultationSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerFactorsScreeningSociodemographic characteristicsWomen

Identifiers

PMID32252733
PMCPMC7137499
OpenAlexW3014312501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.