Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252715›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Physical activity in paid work time for desk-based employees: a qualitative study of employers' and employees' perspectives.

Gemma C Ryde, Patricia Atkinson, Martine Stead, Trish Gorely, Josie M M Evans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical Activity Patterns and Lifestyle Habits Among Primary Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Editors' Desk - Creating a Movement for Healthy Physical Activity at Work.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Exploring the Enjoyment of the Intergenerational Physical Activity.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma C RydeFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. gemma.ryde@stir.ac.uk.
Patricia AtkinsonFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
Martine SteadFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
Trish GorelyDepartment of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, IV3 5SQ, Scotland, UK.
Josie M M EvansFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
University of Stirling · GBUniversity of the Highlands and Islands · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor physical and mental health of employees create significant problems in the workplace. Physical activity (PA) has been shown as an effective strategy for preventing and treating numerous physical and mental health issues as well as work performance outcomes. However, there are many barriers to taking part in PA (such as lack of time) with participation rates typically low. Providing PA in paid work time might be a way to overcome these issues, yet employers' and employees' opinions of this concept are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore employee and employer perspectives of PA in paid work time.

methodsWorkplaces were recruited through existing contacts on the research team. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with employees and managers at one University and two executive non-departmental public bodies in central Scotland with mainly desk-based employees. Both managers and employees were involved to gain perspectives throughout the organisational hierarchy and were interviewed separately to reduce social desirability bias. All discussions were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed thematically for both managers and employees but due to significant overlap in themes between the groups, these are reported together in the results.

resultsThree out of five organisations approached took part in this qualitative study. Two individual interviews were held with strategic managers, five focus groups with middle managers (n = 16) and nine with employees (n = 45). Benefits were anticipated by managers and employees for both employees themselves and the organisation and included improved mental health, productivity and more favourable perceptions of the employer. Despite these widely acknowledged benefits, significant barriers were identified and included the structure and nature of the working day (high workload, front line job requirements), workplace culture and norms (resentment from colleagues, no break culture) and organisational concerns (cost of lost time, public perceptions).

conclusionThis study suggests that there are significant barriers to PA in paid work time. Whilst numerous anticipated benefits were conveyed by both employees and managers, PA in paid work time is unlikely to become common place until changes in attitudes and the culture towards movement at work occur.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthOrganizational CultureAdultEfficiencyExerciseFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedOccupational HealthQualitative ResearchScotlandUniversitiesWork PerformancePaid work timePhysical activityQualitativeWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID32252715
PMCPMC7137494
OpenAlexW3014511758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.