Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252713›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Process evaluation of a whole-of-community systems approach to address childhood obesity in western Victoria, Australia.

Ebony Jenkins, Janette Lowe, Steven Allender, Kristy A Bolton

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measuring Shifts in Mental Models in the Prevention of Childhood Obesity in Rural Australia.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Domains of Capacity Building in Whole-Systems Approaches to Prevent Obesity-A "Systematized" Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Trial collaborators' perceptions of the process of delivering Healthy Beginnings advice via telephone calls or text messages.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ebony JenkinsSouthern Grampians Glenelg Primary Care Partnership, Hamilton, Australia.
Janette LoweSouthern Grampians Glenelg Primary Care Partnership, Hamilton, Australia.
Steven AllenderGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Kristy A BoltonGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. kristy.bolton@deakin.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1041020National Health and Medical Research Council APP1114118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSEA Change Portland is a systems-based approach implemented in Portland, Victoria that utilises local community resources to sustainably prevent and reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity. Action is implemented by community-led task teams with differing priority areas, and supported by a steering committee representative of four collaborating organisations. This study examines the SEA Change Portland process to identify significant events, enablers and barriers of its development and implementation to date as reported by key stakeholders involved in implementation during the first 12 months.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with eight steering group members and three community task team members. Data was collected utilising open ended interview questions to gather in-depth information regarding program implementation, and the individual attitudes, beliefs and experiences of key stakeholders.

resultsData were analysed under three key themes: collective impact, systems thinking and asset based community development (ABCD). Participants gave perceptions of significant events; factors positively and negatively affecting the process; reasons for becoming involved in the process; perceived efficacy of task teams, principles of diversity and areas of concern. Themes emerged from participant responses allowing were categorisation of their responses into four key process stages: initial lead up; process development; establishing community ownership of the obesity system; and community action.

conclusionCollective impact was a crucial element in applying the systems thinking. Strong and equitable relationships between steering organisations and topic experts provided the initiative with a sustainable foundation, and ABCD promotes community ownership and future sustainability. Understanding the process of implementing a new whole-of-community systems approach to childhood obesity prevention such as SEA Change Portland has provided vital knowledge for other communities regarding enablers and barriers of this promising approach.

Indexed as

ChildCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrevalenceProcess Assessment, Health CareSystems AnalysisVictoriaAsset based community developmentCollective impactCommunityObesity preventionProcess evaluationSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID32252713
PMCPMC7132875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.