Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252698›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Moving beyond individual barriers and identifying multi-level strategies to reduce anemia in Odisha India.

Erica Sedlander, Michael W Long, Satyanarayan Mohanty, Ashita Munjral, Jeffrey B Bingenheimer, Hagere Yilma, Rajiv N Rimal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erica SedlanderDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire, Washington D.C., 20052, USA. esedlander@gwmail.gwu.edu.
Michael W LongDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire, Washington D.C., 20052, USA.
Satyanarayan MohantyDCOR Consulting, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ashita MunjralIPE Global, Delhi, India.
Jeffrey B BingenheimerDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire, Washington D.C., 20052, USA.
Hagere YilmaDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire, Washington D.C., 20052, USA.
Rajiv N RimalDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire, Washington D.C., 20052, USA.
George Washington University · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1182519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce the prevalence of anemia, the Indian government recommends daily iron and folic acid supplements (iron supplements) for pregnant women and weekly iron supplements for adolescents and all women of reproductive age. The government has distributed free iron supplements to adolescents and pregnant women for over four decades. However, initial uptake and adherence remain inadequate and non-pregnant women of reproductive age are largely ignored. The aim of this study is to examine the multilevel barriers to iron supplement use and to subsequently identify promising areas to intervene.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in the state of Odisha, India. Data collection included key informant interviews, focus group discussions with women, husbands, and mothers-in-law, and direct observations in health centers, pharmacies and village health and nutrition days.

resultsWe found that at the individual level, participants knew that iron supplements prevent anemia but underestimated anemia prevalence and risk in their community. Participants also believed that taking too many iron supplements during pregnancy would "make your baby big" causing a painful birth and a costly cesarean section. At the interpersonal level, mothers-in-law were not supportive of their daughters-in-law taking regular iron supplements during pregnancy but husbands were more supportive. At the community level, participants reported that only pregnant women and adolescents are taking iron supplements, ignoring non-pregnant women altogether. Unequal gender norms are also an upstream barrier for non-pregnant women to prioritize their health to obtain iron supplements. At the policy level, frontline health workers distribute iron supplements to pregnant women only and do not follow up on adherence.

conclusionsInterventions should address multiple barriers to iron supplement use along the socio-ecological model. They should also be tailored to a woman's reproductive life course stage: adolescents, pregnancy, and non-pregnant women of reproductive age because social norms and available services differ between the subpopulations.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAnemiaDietary SupplementsFemaleFocus GroupsFolic AcidHumansIndiaIronIron DeficienciesMaleMultilevel AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyFolic AcidIronGender normsIndiaIron deficiency anemiaSocial norms

Identifiers

PMID32252698
PMCPMC7137437
OpenAlexW3014380205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.