ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020
In vivo ultraosound elastographic evaluation of the age-related change of human lens nuclear stiffness.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Random Forest Algorithm-Based Ultrasonic Image in the Diagnosis of Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome and Its Relationship with Tear Osmotic Pressure.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Large optical zone transepithelial PRK: refractive and aberration outcomes.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Mammalian Ocular Lens in Focus: Development, Anatomy, Physiology, Transparency, Biomechanics, and Age-related Challenges.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Review
- Lens aging and disease: Molecular mechanisms, functional consequences, and pharmacological implications.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- In Vivo Brillouin Analysis of Lens Nucleus and Cortex in Adult Myopic Eyes and Their Correlation With Accommodation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of rodent lens morphometrics and biomechanical properties.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Tissue, cellular, and molecular level determinants for eye lens stiffness and elasticity.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the age-related changes in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus in vivo.
methodsA total of 78 volunteers with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20with a mean ± standard deviation intraocular pressure (IOP) of 16 ± 2.5 mmHg were divided into 3 groups of 26. The mean ages of Groups A, B and C were 81 ± 5.5, 44 ± 3.2 and 21 ± 2.5 years, with mean axial lengths of 23.8 ± 0.5 mm, 23.8 ± 0.4 mm and 23.9 ± 0.3 mm, respectively. Using an elastographer, the ultrasound echolucency and elastic strain rate of the lens nucleus of one eye, selected randomly, of each subject were measured three times. The strain rate of the lens cortex could not be assessed. The qualitative differences in the strain rates across the groups were assessed, and differences in the strain rate ratios of the lens nuclei across groups were analysed by one-way ANOVA.
resultsThe strain rates of the lens nuclei of Group A were much lower than those in Groups B and C, as assessed qualitatively; the elastograph images of the lens nuclei of the older group showed a blue colour.The strain rate ratios of the lens nuclei of Groups A, B and C were 0.02 ± 0.08, 0.69 ± 0.12 and 1.95 ± 0.85, respectively. The differences in the lens nucleus strain rate ratios across the groups were statistically significant, with p-values < 0.05.
conclusionsUltrasound elastography demonstrated in vivo that an older age is associated with a statistically significantly lower lens nucleus strain rate ratio and therefore a markedly higher lens nuclear stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.