ReviewBiosensors2020
Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors for Pesticides Detection Using Screen-Printed Electrodes.
Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Conductive Polymer Nanocomposite for Intelligent Pesticide Sensing: Trends, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in MXene-Based Screen-Printed Electrochemical Sensors for Point-of-Care Biomarker Detections.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Smartphone-Integrated Electrochemical Devices for Contaminant Monitoring in Agriculture and Food: A Review.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Recent Progress in the Application of Tau Protein Biosensors for Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Review
- A 3D printed dual screen-printed electrode separation device for twin electrochemical mini-cell establishment.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Screen-Printed Electrodes as Low-Cost Sensors for Breast Cancer Biomarker Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Applications of chemically modified screen-printed electrodes in food analysis and quality monitoring: a review.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Screen-Printed Stretchable Supercapacitors Based on Tin Sulfide-Decorated Face-Mask-Derived Activated Carbon Electrodes with High Areal Energy Density.ACS applied energy materials · 2024Article
- Development of a simple polymer-based sensor for detection of the Pirimicarb pesticide.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Graphene-based functional electrochemical sensors for the detection of chlorpyrifos in water and food samples: a review.Journal of food science and technology · 2024Review
- Facile Synthesis of Platinum Nanoparticle-Embedded Reduced Graphene Oxide for the Detection of Carbendazim.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Utilizing Electrochemical Biosensors as an Innovative Platform for the Rapid and On-Site Detection of Animal Viruses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Review
- ALP-Based Biosensors Employing Electrodes Modified with Carbon Nanomaterials for Pesticides Detection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- AChE-based electrochemical biosensor for pesticide detection in vegetable oils: matrix effects and synergistic inhibition of the immobilized enzyme.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- PEDOT: PSS/AuNPs-Based Composite as Voltammetric Sensor for the Detection of Pirimicarb.Polymers · 2023Article
- Enzyme Inhibition-Based Assay to Estimate the Contribution of Formulants to the Effect of Commercial Pesticide Formulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Recent Advances of Enzyme-Free Electrochemical Sensors for Flexible Electronics in the Detection of Organophosphorus Compounds: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A graphene quantum dots-glassy carbon electrode-based electrochemical sensor for monitoring malathion.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2023Article
- Electrochemical Organophosphorus Pesticide Detection Using Nanostructured Gold-Modified Electrodes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides are among the most important contaminants in food, leading to important global health problems. While conventional techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (MS) have traditionally been utilized for the detection of such food contaminants, they are relatively expensive, time-consuming and labor intensive, limiting their use for point-of-care (POC) applications. Electrochemical (bio)sensors are emerging devices meeting such expectations, since they represent reliable, simple, cheap, portable, selective and easy to use analytical tools that can be used outside the laboratories by non-specialized personnel. Screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) stand out from the variety of transducers used in electrochemical (bio)sensing because of their small size, high integration, low cost and ability to measure in few microliters of sample. In this context, in this review article, we summarize and discuss about the use of SPEs as analytical tools in the development of (bio)sensors for pesticides of interest for food control. Finally, aspects related to the analytical performance of the developed (bio)sensors together with prospects for future improvements are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.